• fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meanwhile over in the mechanical engineering department, someone is complaining that they have to learn physics when they just wanted to build cool cars.

  • Lakso@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    …then don’t study computer science. I study CS and it’s annoying when someone in a more math/logic oriented course is like “If I get a job at a tech company I won’t need this”. All that IS computer science, if you just wanna code, learn to code.

    • Zetaphor@zemmy.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem is a lot of people who want to learn to code, and are conditioned to desire the college route of education, don’t actually know that there is a difference and that you can be completely self-taught in the field without ever stepping foot in a university.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’re not closing schools despite having libraries and the internet, having (good) teachers is useful to learn faster and get pushed further. There are some good programming schools that can make it more efficient for you. I think the main problem is rather the insane cost of higher education in the USA which create anxiety about being certain that you can repay it in the future it may open for you. It is sad.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can you get well paying coding jobs with upward mobility without at least a BA in CS?

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe not what you’re asking but people with a non-CS M.Sc or PhD commonly switch to coding, especially in the data fields.

    • jakoma02@czech-lemmy.eu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The point of these lectures is mostly not to teach how to work with Turing machines, it is to understand the theoretical limits of computers. The Turing machine is just a simple to describe and well-studied tool used to explore that.

      For example, are there things there that cannot be computed on a computer, no matter for how long it computes? What about if the computer is able to make guesses along the way, can it compute more? Because of this comic, no — it would only be a lot faster.

      Arguably, many programmers can do their job even without knowing any of that. But it certainly helps with seeing the big picture.