This makes absolutely no sense. Front ends that include JavaScript still use css.
Maybe, but they don’t need to. You could write an HTML styling engine in JS if you wanted to.
deleted by creator
no frills? javascript is frills
The only sites I can think of that don’t look like they use css are motherfuckingwebsite.com and bjarne stroustrup’s website.
Any site that uses JS for more than trivial things is going to be a disaster without styling of some kind.
deleted by creator
Problem: Oppenheimer, unlike JavaScript, was actually competent.
If you’ve seen the Barbie movie, there’s a scene where America Ferrera rants about the paradoxes in the expectations on women. The whole “be strong but not pushy” thing.
That’s CSS.
Mid 90s HTML pre CSS:
Removed by mod
How many people who post JS BAD memes could provide a single example of why it’s bad without looking it up?
Security concerns.
deleted by creator
JS bad, please clap
CSS is used to create the design, basically the look (colors, layout and so on), but no substance.
JavaScript is used to implement code and logic.HTML + JavaScript would typically (since you’re supposed to use CSS to create colors and design) look very dull, thus the black-and-white Oppenheimer.
document.querySelector('.whatever').style.color = "red";
Don’t recommend, though.
Sure, but setting the .style attribute could really be argued as using CSS, just with a different interface. W3Schools refers to this as “inline CSS”.