You must log in or register to comment.
It is already far too late to argue for carbon cutting only solutions. Maybe 10 years ago but as it stands, carbon sequestration is 100% necessary.
I read the title as ‘first carbon-removal plant’ and thought: don’t they all do that?
Removing 1 tonne of co2 by using far more coal-produced energy. Great job people, just brilliant. /s
Is it actually coal powered? I didn’t see the word coal in the article.
No, there is no mention of coal or a specific power usage in the article, but every method I’ve seen so far, put more co2 in the air than it manages to pull out of it. Coal was merely an assumption.