“Monster Liberty”: That’s how the otherwise excellent closed-captioning service in the auditorium at Pennridge High School interpreted “Moms for Liberty,” while one of several dozen citizens who had waited in line to lambast the group spoke at the podium. A chuckle rose up among the parents in the crowded school board meeting, held on a late August evening after the first day of classes for the Pennridge School District in suburban Bucks County, Pennsylvania. “Fair enough,” one mother whispered to another.

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      We all need to devote more time to finding and voting against these groups in our local elections. especially in towns like this that seem to have a majority of rational parents.

  • Maeve@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It was neither “rally” nor “riot.” It was a planned insurrection and you can bet the farm if it was blm or antifa doing it, we’d be witnessing public executions for it.

  • glarf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    This makes it feel even more bleak. Where is all this money coming from?! Who is funding this and how?

    • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      The same fucks as always. Peter Theil, the Kochs, the Davos’, pick your billionaire. They didn’t become billionaires by being awesome people and y’know, bringing everyone up with them. More like, when their tide was rising, they paid goons to short leash the marina to the docks (which would sink them if the tide rose high enough).

      Who’s the squeaky wheel, who pays them and who stands to benefit.

      Its always the rich behind fascists, because 1. They don’t want the system they’re so capable of gaming to change (unless it cements their position) and B. They are assuming they’ll be above reproach if the fascists win.

      Make no mistake, every billionaire alive would sell us all, and our children, out rather than become a $900 millionaire.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because people having tens of millions of dollars in assets is a societal failure. Let alone people having hundreds of Millions, or billions, or trillions. You don’t get to be a person that wealthy by being a good person. It requires deception theft and oppression. And it only gets exponentially worse. Because these bad people have outsized pools of resources to further damage society.

      Until we as a society place reasonable limits on personal wealth and assets this will get worse.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      ✝️

      Because why feed the poor with little ROI when you can astroturf education initiatives to increase indoctrination for $$$ in future donations?

  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Before the meeting, people exchanged wisecracks about “talented clappers” — an inside-joke reference to an email circulated among local conservatives that appealed for sympathetic outsiders to turn out and applaud the right-wing agenda: “You do not need to be a resident to attend and clap,” it advised, for “policies that bless and protect our children.”

    Is this a form of paid protestors?

    • Neve8028@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 year ago

      Astroturfing is:

      The disguising of an orchestrated campaign as a “grass-roots” event

        • gsfraley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a rough definition, but astroturfing is usually rooted in goals separate from or even counter to the stated movement. E.g. in your example outside support for a labor movement wouldn’t necessarily be astroturfing if it’s genuinely supporting labor. A fake labor movement sprouted by the companies themselves to take the wind out of the sails of real labor movements would.

        • Neve8028@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Wikipedia has a more specific definition in the first paragraph:

          Astroturfing is the practice of hiding the sponsors of a message or organization (e.g., political, advertising, religious, or public relations) to make it appear as though it originates from, and is supported by, grassroots participants. It is a practice intended to give the statements or organizations credibility by withholding information about the source’s financial backers.

          I think it’s pretty hard to argue that labor unions can be astroturfing. It’s not like they have a lot of wealthy donors who are secretly trying to push narratives to encourage workers organizing.