Bonus Canadian edition:

    • atocci@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’re reading the chart wrong, you have to follow the axis lines that match the angle of the numbers

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think I see what you mean, but really then you’re only ever looking at soil made up of two types. Clay loam could be 30 clay / 70 silt, or 60 clay / 40 sand, or 30 silt / 70 sand. That doesn’t make sense, because you could also, for example have a 30 clay / 70 silt in the sandy clay loam or silty clay loam regions - the 3rd thing is supposed to tell you where along the line you stop, yet whenever you do that you have 3 percentages that add up to more than 100%.

        Maybe you wouldn’t call it 50% sand, and instead pick one of the sand diagonals to get a point in the clay loam region, but no matter how I look at it the percentages don’t add up.

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          You’re misinterpreting the lines. Each number only corresponds to the line perpendicular to the 100 point on their axis, and each line only corresponds to one number, not the 2 it looks like it connects to.

          So for example, if you’re looking at the middle-top point of the “clay loam” category, right above the ‘l’, you get 30% sand/40% clay/30% silt.

        • atocci@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          No I think you’re still misunderstanding. For example, here I’ve chosen a random point in the clay loam section of the chart. We can follow the three lines to the numbers on the sides of the triangle and see that this clay loam would be made up of 30% clay, 30% silt, and 40% sand. You have to follow the lines that match the angle of the number on the side of the chart you are looking at.

  • BeefPiano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t understand how to read the top one.

    So the “a” in “loam” in the middle-bottom, it’s at an intersection of 3 lines. If I follow those lines to each side I see that loam is 60% clay, 40% silt, 60% sand, and 40% sand.

    Ok, maybe I’m not supposed to follow the grey lines, but the cardinal directions? To the left, loam is 20% clay, to the right 80% silt, and below 50% sand.

    The more I try to understand this chart the more confused I get.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Follow the orientation of the numbers. On the left, horizontal lines. On the bottom SE to NW lines (\) On the right, NE to SW lines (/)

      So, loam is 20% clay, 40% sand, 40% silt.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Geotech class was great for a bunch of graphs that made you go WTF in what they were trying to show in a way that made sense visually.

    The lab was really fun, though.

    • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      It has to do with classification of the soil type. Soils with high clay content function similarly in regard to the soil chemistry and in most fields: hydraulic flow. Soils with such a clay component to be designated as just “Clay” will have consistent structure characteristics and act as a restrictive layer.