• sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s interesting that Dave mentioned education as a possible market for these. I thought kids were learning Javascript on their school-issued Chromebooks these days. It would be nice to teach students about the concepts of computer hardware architecture… but the Commander’s architecture is kinda weird, being a hodgepodge of ancient (6502) and modern (FPGA), with bank-switched memory and the desire for backwards compatibility with Commodore peripherals hanging off of it like a lamprey. Sure, students could learn about computer architecture on it, but it’s hard to see how it’s better than other, cheaper options. Big money awaits if they can pull it off though.

      • feoh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Or maybe there are people who find working in low powered environments that behave a certain way, more like computers did in the 80s enjoyable.

        It’s not about boomers or what’s powerful and what’s not. Some things are just for fun and that’s all the justification they need IMO.

  • xyzzy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Isn’t educational use the whole point of Raspberry Pi? It seems like that has way more opportunity for it with a modern architecture, ready-made robotics kits, and other maker-type applications that could get kids excited about electronics and programming.

  • irdc@derp.foo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Though I really like the concept of building a new device which incorporates the inherent ease of programmability of the computers of yore, I think the 6502 is just too weird and limited for doing so. For example, in order to cram a halfway decent amount of memory into the thing they had to resort to bank switching. At the least they should’ve gone with a 65816 (apparently they tried but they initially had some problems with the '816 address bus multiplexing).

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah I see the Commander X16 as a bit of a folly, a hobby project by some serious retro computer nerds. I don’t think it has any viability as a platform, even as a gaming platform, as it’s a strange implementation of a weird architecture.

      That said, yeah there really isn’t something that is as imminently accessible as a C64 was, where the machine itself plugs into a monitor and keyboard, and you program the device using itself.

      Arduino requires a PC or other device to compile and run code, most of them are very low power devices that must have compiled binaries, so they’re programmed in C++.

      Maximite is another guy’s attempt to have a standalone BASIC machine. Uses fairly modern hardware but it’s still some guy’s project, and runs BASIC rather than anything remotely modern.

      Raspberry Pi and other Linux SBCs are surprisingly powerful, but also very complicated to run. You can do a college degree in Linux sysadmin.

      Meanwhile, I’ve played with the MicroPython language a bit, and as cool as it is, it can be a pain in the ass to manage because it runs on a microcontroller meant to be programmed from a PC, so there’s a pile (not a stack, not a heap, a pile) of software you have to manage. So it’s cool, but sorta supported on a bunch of platforms none of which are amazing to use and it’s got almost every problem that Arduino does.

    • feoh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Also, how would that ‘weirdness’ impact using the device in a teaching context?

      • irdc@derp.foo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        People would learn bad habits.

        For example, due to parameter passing often being done via the zero page, recursion is unnecessarily hard on the 6502, whereas one could argue that recursion is one of the major skills to master for any programmer.

        • Richard@mastodon.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          @irdc @feoh All programmers need to learn recursion and fully understand it so when they encounter it in the wild they can properly analyze what it is doing and replace it with non-recursive code.

          • irdc@derp.foo
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            A non-recursive recursive descent parser isn’t any easier to reason about.

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        They learn how to program in a more efficient way that makes better use of limited memory and CPU cycles. Which frankly is something modern programmers and game designers could very much benefit from considering how bloated and unoptimized much of modern software is, probably because they didn’t need to think about whether computers can actually run it.

      • irdc@derp.foo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        There’s plenty of choices. If you want that retro vibe go for a 68k, if you want something neat but obscure (and are willing to use an FPGA) choose the pdp-11, if you want to go with the flow then use risc-v.

        But please pick something that’s not actively fighting modern (that is, not 1970’s) programming techniques.