President Joe Biden — perhaps the nation’s biggest Amtrak fan — is set to promote new federal investments for trains on the heavily trafficked Northeast Corridor.

The Democratic president is headed to Bear, Delaware, on Monday to announce more than $16 billion in new funding that will go toward 25 passenger rail projects between Boston and Washington, the White House says. Bear is located about 12 miles (20 kilometers) from Biden’s home of Wilmington.

His remarks will be held at the Amtrak Bear Maintenance Shops, where trains are maintained and repaired. The investments, the White House says, will help trains run faster, cut delays and create union jobs.

  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I hope they actually start refurbishing the rails themselves soon, Trains keep getting bigger and heavier but lines stay the same. Another huge derailment happened a few days ago, right?

    • RubberStuntBaby@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I kinda feel like the highly profitable railroads should be forced to pay for their own upgrades. Especially since they keep making trains bigger to increase their profits.

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s kind of dumb, no offence, because if companies are in charge then they’ll intentionally do a bare minimum cut corners hack job. Just tax them and other (arguably worse) industries and use the tax revenue to make a proper improved rail system.

    • stella@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes. Taxpayer money to for-profit corporations that have been posting record profits for years!

      ‘based’ Joe! Lol.

      Rubes.

        • stella@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          How much do their executives get paid?

          Profit can easily be manipulated by just raising salaries. All of a sudden its a business expense and not profit.

          But surely you understand this, right? Clown?

            • stella@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Okay. Would you rather talk about their overpaid executives?

              You’re just trying to avoid admitting that they have the money for these projects, but it’s being funneled to a few people who don’t do any actual work.

              • OniiFam@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                Do me a favor and check how much these executives make. Please. Tell me how much free money they have to make massive infrastructure projects.

                Next time try to actually know the minimal amount of information about something before you default to your blind talking point spiel. It’s really embarrassing

                • stella@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I’m not going to do your research for you.

                  If you want to believe that they’re just scraping by and need taxpayer handouts to expand, then I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

  • RHTeebs@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is good. Maybe this will lead to the new Acela finally entering service.

    They were supposed to enter service in 2021, but they have been in storage all over the north east until Alstom (the manufacturer) is able to fix the hydraulic, and computer issues, along with the outdated infrastructure on the corridor.

    I have 2 brand new Acela train sets sitting in the freight yard of my home town. They’ve been there for over 2 months now. I like seeing them, but, they should be running by now.

  • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Why is decent rail service, like basic medical care, a contentious issue in the U.S.? Even this article casts shade by saying ‘Bear is located about 12 miles (20 kilometers) from Biden’s home of Wilmington.’ As if having access to public transportation is some kind of left wing elite privelege that no one else can utilize.

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Car companies successfully got out ahead of Adam Something and NJB viewers to conspiricize 15 minute cities

    • Igloojoe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      America is about twice the size of all of Europe. Railroads were controlled by monopoly rich people. Once America became more industrialized, planes became a better cargo transit option. That and the interstate system made trucks an even better economical option. Railroads were not an option as they were expensive and land intensive(which also meant more money for acquiring land)

      For medical care, the US government actually spends a bunch on healthcare on par with most other countries. Just that a majority of the monet will go to a bloated medical company into a billionair’s pocket before any of it applies to an individual.

      So, extreme capitalism ruined both. Yet we have politicians and people who think we should push further towards a capitalistic way of running things…

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Maybe North America but Europe is larger than the US and especially the contiguous US. There are also a shit ton of different countries in Europe which all have different laws and standards which are not easy to work with. They seemed to be able to do just fine. Although they did not cater near as much to auto manufacturers and rip up rail line we did in the US.

        As for medical care, the US spends significantly more per person (19% of GDP vs 10-11% for most others) and you are correct that the main reason for that is bloated medical companies.

      • ares35@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        the u.s. spends up to twice as much on health care, and doesn’t cover ‘as much’ or ‘as many’, as those other nations that have nationalized or ‘socialized’ health care programs.

      • Redscare867@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Railroads are land intensive but somehow 27 lane highways aren’t? Also wait until you find out how expensive it is to maintain all of those highways…

        • Igloojoe@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Railroads have always been business owned. So acquiring land is expensive for them. Highways and interstates are government owned. So they just forced owners to accept the appraised value.

          • Redscare867@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            And for whatever reason you think we couldn’t do literally the exact same thing we did with highways to build nationalized rail?

            • Igloojoe@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              I wish we did. It seems logical that railroads should be government run transit option.

      • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        California is as densely populated as Spain, which has an excellent high speed rail network, the northeastern US has densities comparable with Central Europe and the rest of the East coast is well within the ranges seen in western Europe.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      One part of the problem is that Congress has a rural bias, so there are a lot of rural Congresspersons who don’t see the benefit of better rail service so they won’t vote for it.

  • stella@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Why aren’t these being paid for with the profits from the business?

  • RHTeebs@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is good. Maybe this will lead to the new Acela finally entering service.

    They were supposed to enter service in 2021, but they have been in storage all over the north east until Alstom (the manufacturer) is able to fix the hydraulic, and computer issues, along with the outdated infrastructure on the corridor.

    I have 2 brand new Acela train sets sitting in the freight yard of my home town. They’ve been there for over 2 months now. I like seeing them, but, they should be running by now.

    • ExLisper@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Expert? He says that those are ‘things that go against future high-speed rail’. There’s no future high-speed rail in USA. Not unless he’s talking about year 5000. Stopping investment because it goes against projects that USA is simply unable to build doesn’t make much sense.

      • bluGill@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Spending way too much money on projects is why we can’t build. The best thing to do is starve the beasts making money of of way too expensive projects. If the return on investment isn’t good then the smart thing to do is not invest. If Biden wants to support rail (high speed or otherwise) he needs to reform the systems that make costs too high, not keep funding them.

  • blazera@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    The biggest Amtrak fan? Maybe he can stop fucking them over by refusing to enforce existing law to give right-of-way preference to passenger rail.

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      He doesn’t seem to be a big fan of commercial rail either as the federal government stepped in to quash workers striking over lax safety shortly before that train derailed and dumped toxic waste all over a city in Ohio.

    • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      If he did that then warren buffet might only earn an extra billion instead of the 1.2 billion he was hoping for. The horror!

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’ve love it, but want way more than 16b. The entire west needs Acelas or better! And new rail lines for passenger rail in places like CO and the cascadia area.