• Vant@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    It hasn’t been in print in years and now they’ve stopped grouping articles together as “digital magazines”. They still do articles. This is boomer doomer news. They adapted to a new media reality.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Too bad. I used to love Popular Science. But as time has passed the articles have become far more speculative and fantastical. Same with Popular Mechanics, once a staple of DIY home creations to sucking the military’s dick with MIC dream weapons and UFOs.

    Time for them to die.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Too bad. I used to love Popular Science. But as time has passed the articles have become far more speculative and fantastical. Same with Popular Mechanics, once a staple of DIY home creations to sucking the military’s dick with MIC dream weapons and UFOs.

      Both were staples in my house in the early 90s. I learned so god damned much from popsci and popular mechanics, but holy lord popsci and then popmech got bad.

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Not inaccurate. The hyperloop was a rebranded vac-train concept from around 1900, and he knew he could not patent it, so he claimed that he was willingly open sourcing the white paper out of generosity. The idea was not feasible then nor now and we can’t tell if he realized that.