• roguetrick@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Owning shares is actually the method they’re using to have standing to sue. It’s a shareholder suit. For those curious about which orders, it’s a teaching order, a nursing order, a Dominican order (the odd man out), and a franciscian order.

  • Throwaway@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    God I’m glad not to be Catholic. They don’t have a legal leg to stand on, this is just throwing money away.

    • quindraco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      They do, in fact, have a legal leg to stand in. As shareholders, they can sue their board of directors for mismanagement.

  • bluGill@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    We don’t like the first and second amendments so we will just use the courts to make them effectively obsolete. (If you don’t think assault weapons are a first amendment issue then you don’t know what the actual definition is)

    • quindraco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Speaking as someone who knows the definition (or more accurately, that there isn’t one), it is not a first amendment issue.

  • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I think gun control is necessary legislation, but the term “assault-style weapon” is not based on the function of a firearm or its ability to cause harm. It’s a nonsense phrase used to describe guns that look scary.

  • Im14abeer@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Did your clients purchase shares with the express intent to create standing in a case such as this?”

    “Of course not your honor”

    “Did your clients do due diligence on their investment before purchasing their shares?”

    “Yes your honor.”

    “And during this due diligence, did they in fact find that the main component of the company’s business is the manufacture of firearms and had been so since 1852?”

    “Yes your honor.”

    “Have the sisters ever heard of Dirty Harry?”

    “Your honor?”

    Summary judgement for dismissal in 3…2…

  • flicker@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Absolutely fascinating! As shareholders they have a unique standing for this suit. I’m going to be watching this closely.

    Wow. Innovative way to try to force change, nuns. Regardless of how you feel about guns, this is a very interesting way to attempt to accomplish their goal.