In Pennsylvania, residents are resisting a corporate takeover of their water system as state lawmakers attempt to change a law that incentivizes privatization.

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Not shocking at all. Water and sewer should be run by your local government for public interest and not for profit.

    • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      When public services are run for-profit, services get cut down right up to the regulation line.

      Why bother getting 99.9999999% of the bacteria and literal shit out of the water when regulations say I only need to get 98%? BTW I bribed lobbied politicians to change regulations down from 99.99%. That was just unreasonable and everyone knows a little cholera is good for the heart.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    No shit. The private companies aren’t buying it up to lose money. They want to profit, and that means they’re going to charge you as much as possible for as little as possible.

  • IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    WHAAAAAAAATT??? CONSUMERS HOSED BY ORIVATUZATION OF GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBILITY??

    NOOOOOOOO!!!

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Wow, its almost as if essential services shouldnt be profit driven, since they arent fucking businesses, they are fucking services.

    • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      But how are the oligarchs going to squeeze every last penny out of the peasants, if public services serve the interest of the public? Checkmate leftists!

  • ElectricCattleman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    My sister is a civil engineer in PA and is familiar with this situation. She told me that basically these municipalities did not take care of their pipes, refused to raise any money for them, then, when they got old enough that the situation became critical, sold it off. Now this company comes along, has to make required fixes to the pipes, and has to raise the money to do so. The private company gets to be the bad guy, while the local governments, who neglected the pipes for a decade or more, don’t get heat.

    All this said, if they weren’t allowed to sell it to a private company, there would be no “get out of jail free” card and maybe they would have pushed harder to take care of them damn pipes.

    Point is, I don’t think it’s quite as simple as it looks on the surface.

    • masquenox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      She told me that basically these municipalities did not take care of their pipes,

      So it’s bog-standard “let-it-break-and-then-sell-it-for-a-song” neolib shitfuckery.

      • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s the same tactic for the NHS in the UK, the one remaining publicly-owned service the Tories can’t get away with selling off, so they’re letting it slowly die.