• Rullejorge@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    As a foreigner I am surprised it took this long. Will likely not lessen the support for Trump, but nearly nothing will at this point.

    • InputZero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      As a foreigner who’s spent a lot of time in America, this may actually be good for Trump. I am not 100% sure how elections work in the US, but at most this will keep his name off a ballot Trump would never win and at best it will ensure his name has to be on every ballot. Assuming the SCOTUS overturns it, it sets a precedent that the POTUS is not an officer and therefore isn’t included in any legal language that concerns officers. Which opens up expansion of the powers of the executive. Still assuming that the SCOTUS overturns it it could play right into the Project 2025 playbook.

    • roux [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      It feels very much like a political show of sorts. Trump wasnt gonna get the CO vote regardless. Similar to how in kind, Texas is threatening to remove Biden from the ballot. Texas is gonna be a red vote no matter who is running until at least the boomers and gen xers die off.

  • Hegar@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    The ballot disqualification part is cool and all, but isn’t the bigger deal a legal ruling saying yes it was obviously an insurrection and yes he obviously incited it?

    This decision was about whether the whole “not being allowed on the ballot if you incite an insurrection” thing was intended to apply to the president, or just everyone else. That’s a weird discussion to have after deciding a leading presidential contender obviously tried a coup. I’d really prefer we focus back on the coup part, and maybe less on the intentions of 150+ y/o lawmakers.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Great idea, ban the frontrunner of the only other viable Party from running for office, this won’t have any consequences at all!

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          The nation is only as strong as we’re willing to fight corruption and enforce laws.

          If Trump faces no consequences it will be easier for the next dictator wannabe to seize control.

          Pissing off maga morons is a small price to pay.

    • Unaware7013@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Great idea, don’t hold former presidents to account when they attempt to subvert democracy, that won’t have any consequences at all!

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        If they wanted to hold him to account they’d have charged him immediately after the insurrection, rather than waiting for the next election. Why did they wait so long? Now he’s campaigning and can use every decision against him to rally his supporters into a frothing mob.

        • Unaware7013@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          You mean like the impeachment or any of the trials we’ve had for his criminal behavior? Yeah, why didn’t they do that immediately??? And while we’re at it, why does the legal system move so slowly???

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            The impeachment was literally nothing.

            What I mean is that he could have been arraigned much earlier. They slow walked the charges so that he’d have time to become the frontrunner in order to sabotage the GOP. This isn’t just the law moving slowly, this is a political strategy to ensure Biden’s reelection.

            This will only result in his cult becoming radicalized.

            Hopefully they don’t get violent.

            • Jordan_U@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago
              1. Federal courts just move slowly. Any of the current cases against Trump taking less than 6 years would be an anomaly. That’s not an endorsement of our current system of justice, far from it.

              2. Trump notoriously uses delay as his primary legal tactic; Has done for decades.

              His lawyers have taken every opportunity to take legal actions doomed to “fail” because they knew they would gum up the works and move trial dates further back. They have argued at every turn for delays, and are currently complaining about being told to work over the holidays because a judge gave them strict deadlines for filing briefs in Trump’s own appeal which has paused all actions in the case until it is resolved.

              (The appeal is that Trump has “absolute immunity” and therefore can’t even be tried, let alone convicted, for any crimes he may have committed while president. It’s absurd on its face)

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Federal courts just move slowly.

                The J-6th rioters got court hearings and sentences before Trump was even brought up on charges. That’s telling.

                Now it’s too late and he’s the frontrunner. By taking so long they might destabilize the country.