• OpenStars@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Points gun at you: “I win”. /s

    (you may think this is in poor taste but consider: isn’t this the actual, authentic reality of the situation?)

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Couldn’t this be attributed to the lower population density of conservative areas? You would expect to see lower wealth in areas with lower population, even if the wealth per capita is higher

    • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Do you think the wealth per capita is higher in Wisconsin Wyoming (I am not American) than in Colorado?

  • Jentu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’d rather fight alongside republicans and democrats to make sure everyone lives in dignity and isn’t ground into dust by the gears of capitalism rather than pushing more red vs blue rhetoric. Fuck the politicians that put the south in the position it’s in today.

      • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        i’d rather call it “unregulated capitalism”. because it seems to work pretty goddamn well in most european countries, and they regulate to what extent you can exploit your workers. unions are a good thing for everyone.

        • ChaosAD@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          That goes well for them because they exploit the global south.

          The main criminals in Amazon forest are Norwegians and Canadians companies.

          Capitalism is only good for them. The rest of the world is fucked because of it.