• Nath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Woolies would keep the crap if people bought it. I’m unconvinced they would drop the range if it were making them buckets of money.

    I’ll bet it’s loads more profit per shelf to fill that space with back-to-school stuff.

    It’s us who don’t want Australia Day stuff. Possibly because we don’t exactly have wads of spare disposable income to spend on luxuries? Maybe because we have a personal stance on Australia Day? Maybe we just don’t care?

    • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Woolies would keep the crap if people bought it. I’m unconvinced they would drop the range if it were making them buckets of money.

      Nah, it’s just more DEI-led stuff where they’re trying to pander to the vocal minority to score points, like Bud Light and Target did in America, where it backfired massively. Make no mistake, they’re dropping it for “inclusivity” like Kmart did, not because it doesn’t make money. They even mentioned this in their statement:

      There has been a gradual decline in demand for Australia Day merchandise from our stores over recent years. At the same time there’s been broader discussion about 26 January and what it means to different parts of the community,"

      It’ll be back next year when they fuck around and find out this year. Keep politics and pandering out of grocery stores. Didn’t ever think I’d have to say that lol. It’s ridiculous.

      • 🦘min0nim🦘@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Fuck around and find out that stocking shelves for a one day event with cheap plastic crap that isn’t selling well is a bad idea?

        ‘Help help, I’m being repressed!’

        • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          It means an easy excuse that they can throw out there to make people like you believe it’s not just for the stupid “inclusivity” reason, and it clearly works on the gullible.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Make no mistake, they’re dropping it for “inclusivity” like Kmart did, not because it doesn’t make money.

        Even if this were true, it would be because they’ve determined that the “inclusivity” (whatever that is) is going to make them money.

            • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Bud Light tanked. It was the number 1 beer in its category up until that decision - a title it had held for 20 years. It isn’t now.

              Their vice president responsible for it was removed.

              They lost marketshare across the board.

              Their american sales have not recovered.

              Bill Gates threw $100 million at their stock in an effort to get it to go back up. Remember - Bud Light is not their whole company. Bud Light has likely been irrevocably harmed. Other beer brands have gained market share, Bud Light lost the number 1 spot it had held for 20 years. Share price isn’t everything when it’s a worldwide brand.

              • fine_sandy_bottom@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Some facebook-meme level reasoning here bro. If gates bought $100m in stock in september then he’s made $10m on that bet in the last 4 months. You can cherry-pick whatever factoids you like but the bare facts are, no one really cares.

                I guess we will see what happens when woolies share price tanks this week. SMH.

                • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  So you ignore 90% of my post that proves my point to focus on the 10% that you think proves yours? Lol

                  Let me guess - it was a coincidence that bud light got dethroned after 20 years at the same time they pulled their stunt?

      • Nath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’ll be back next year when they fuck around and find out this year.

        Ultimately, Coles and Woolies are untouchable. It’s almost impossible to boycott them. That’s the whole problem with the grocery duopoly in Australia. I don’t foresee this move having any impact on them either way. They know it, too. You may be right and they’re pandering somewhat, but I am a cynic and I believe they’re doing it because the range isn’t making enough money to justify its shelf space.

        • Lintson@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          In a large city they can be practically boycotted. Most people just can’t be bothered.

        • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          They’re absolutely pandering, which is why they put this in their statement:

          At the same time there’s been broader discussion about 26 January and what it means to different parts of the community

  • mx_smith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    TIL Woolworth’s are still around in Australia. I can’t remember the last time I went into a Woolworths here in the states.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Completely different companies. Just coincidentally same name.

      We do have Target though. No walmart.

  • TinyBreak@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Agreed! Lets boycott Dutton. Oh wait, sorry. I misread that. Well, I’ve already typed it now so Im sticking with it.

  • Atin@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m all for boycotting Woolies for their business practices, but not as much as I am for boycotting that semi sentient potato.

    • Nath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It’s Hot Potato, Hot Potato. Then we get to mashed Banana. Honestly, do you even wiggle?!

      • zero_gravitas@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’re correct, but I think most people would be more inclined to characterise Dutton as ‘mashed’ rather than ‘hot’ 😆

  • TrippaSnippa@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    The less cheap plastic crap that will end up in landfill and waterways on the 27th the better. What a stupid thing to kick up a stink about. I know why he’s doing it but I’m sick of conservatives turning every little fucking thing into more culture war bullshit. Just fuck off already.

  • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    which the retailer says is due to lack of customer demand

    They let it slip when Kmart said it was due to “inclusiveness” though. We all know it’s not from lack of demand, it’s from the usual woke pandering.

    • Salvo@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Often Marketing is just Marketing. Those people who are triggered by the word “inclusiveness” will consider it either Pandering or Acknowledgement of people’s feelings. Those of us who are rational will recognise it for what it is; Spin to justify a decision based on maximising profit.