• awwwyissss@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Nobody’s gonna say it? I have to be the one, really? Fine.

    HELL YEAH LETS GO!

    We need some good news and to recognize and appreciate it.

  • keepthepace@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Weird forecast… Why that sudden jump and then slow down? Looks like an exponential that they extrapolated linearly…

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Because there are a ton of new manufacturing facilities for wind and solar under construction, so you expect to see a sudden jump. The IEA then assumes no further policy changes to cause adoption rates to increase at the same rate as that jump.

  • Drusas@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I would point out that hydropower may be renewable but isn’t necessarily environmentally friendly. Especially if you live somewhere with salmon.

            • Sonori@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Well, I believe about half of all species of salmon will be extinct inside the next thirty years owing to temperature increases, so, as someone who likes fishing in my local river, I’ll happily take some dead salmon now for better solar power storage if it helps the odds of keeping about half of them alive. We lose vast amounts of salmon either way, but this way we only lose salmon and a few other types of fish and not, you know, a good chunk of all marine life like we do if we keep on our current rate of transition.

              • Drusas@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                It sounds like you underestimate how important salmon is to a good chunk of all marine life. Particularly orcas.

                • Sonori@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  It sounds like you underestimate just how temputure dependent many types of salmon are and just how short of a time they have left to live in a 2C+ world. Many of their spawning locations are also in areas that are seeing the highest relative temperature change.

                  aThe point was that climate change is going to kill more salmon and vastly more other types of marine life than a handful of dams, but thouse few dams could have a significant effect on the amount of carbon emitted by the second largest polluter on earth by providing the nighttime energy that is currently done with dozens of brand new natural gas plants. With the way solar in particular is scaling up, dispatchable energy storage is going to be the primary limiting factor on how hot things get, and therefore how many species of salmon are going extinct in our lifetime.

    • Sonori@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      With proper midigations it’s fast more eco friendly than the natural gas power plants were still building more of to make up for the fact that solar only ouputs in the day and we can only spin up new lithium mines and battery factories so fast.

  • GordonBrightfoot@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    This doesn’t have a section for energy storage, which is exploding right now as well. That’s a big part of the story that makes this good news even better.

  • Antitoxic9087@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    To triple the RE capacity by 2030, we need to double the current speed, or linearly increase the deployment speed until it reach 1.5TW/yr by 2030.

    Ambitious but totally feasible.