What happened next that evening in May 2021 is the basis for a lawsuit by the mother alleging that Burlington police used excessive force and discriminated against her unarmed son, who is Black and has behavioral and intellectual disabilities.

After he failed to hand over the last of the stolen e-cigarettes, two officers physically forced him to do so, then Cathy Austrian’s son was handcuffed and pinned to the ground as he screamed and struggled, according to a civil lawsuit filed Tuesday and police body-camera video shared with The Associated Press by the American Civil Liberties Union of Vermont.

The teen eventually was injected with a ketamine, a sedative, then taken to a hospital, according to the lawsuit and video.

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Obviously the police are the criminals here, but that mom…

    Idk. And clearly didn’t grow up being told what I was always told: “if you’ve got a problem and you call the police, now you’ve got two problems.”

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yeah this is some abusive, privileged bullshit and I really hope this idiot learned a lesson. I also hope her child reminds her of this shit anytime she starts mounting her high horse in the future.

      • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yes, the elderly woman that adopted an at-needs child of color is the one being abusive and privileged.

        The abusive, privileged bullshit is your comment.

          • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            She mistakenly thought that calling the cops to talk to her child about not stealing would help him understand why it’s wrong and what the stakes are. She’s an old white woman. She didn’t realize that cops wouldn’t treat her large, black child as subhuman.

            She was stupid and ignorant, but the cops are the monsters here. Don’t get it twisted.

            I think we can safely assume she won’t make that mistake again. The way her son hugged her after this ordeal says a lot about their relationship. Let’s not get fuckery about this and think that a mother trying to help her child is the one to blame.

            She shouldn’t have done it, but not everyone grows up having police brutalize every non-white person they see. She’s learning that now. Those of us that aren’t white have known that for a long time.

            • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Insanely weird to project your parental issues on a lady calling the cops on her adopted black child, but being old is not an excuse for not being aware of the century long issue of cops treating black people poorly.

              • Doof@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                there was a time where media portrayed that as a reasonable thing to do, the police would come and talk to their kid. I’ve heard stories about it happening. Hell when i kid we got caught being destructive and the cops who caught us took us on tour of where we could end up. We got brought in the truck straight to the cells. It is a foolish thought but a person who holds some idyllic model in their heads sometimes are blinded by it.

                • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  She has a black lives matter sign in front of her house.

                  She isnt senile, and she is aware of a movement dedicated to dealing with police aggression.

                  Her age isnt an excuse. She clearly should have known better. Its insane to excuse her behavior.

                • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  When I was in cubs as a child, they took us to a police station and the cops talked to us about various things, we got our fingerprints taken (for us to keep, not their system) and we got to check out the jail cells.

                  Cops have definitely been used for educational purposes in the past. I don’t remember much of it specifically, but i remember it being a great experience.

                • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  ???

                  There was no “no u” here.

                  Are you whiny about the fact that they projected their parental issues onto anyone who correctly judged the idiot for calling the cops? Thats their projection, that they said.

                  Correctly noting the idiot should have known better about the older-than-her issue of cops beating black folk for the sin of being black has nothing to do with anyones parents.

                  Telling someone not to project their problems isnt a “no u,” but its cute your best retort was to brag about how poorly you read.

    • mainframegremlin@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      What sound does a cow make? Moo. What sound does a dog make? Woof. What sound does a cat make? Meow. What sound does a pig make? UP AGAINST THE WALL MOTHER FUCKER.

  • Fisk400@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is a minor problem compared to the fucking forced ketamin injections but can we please use more words to describe these types of issues. Like, specific ones. “Behavioral issues and intellectual disabilities” has also been used to describe the kid that almost beat a teacher to death for saying he shouldn’t have his Nintendo in school and the flying guy that tried to kill the judge. If there is no difference between how we describe them and this kid, we are just reinventing calling people retarded in increasingly elaborate ways.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Meh, not criminalizing children is usually a good thing, and language is an important part of that.

    • medgremlin@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I see your point, but that is a bigger can of worms than I think you are expecting. There are dozens of genetic or congenital disorders that can lead to intellectual disabilities and hundreds of acquired ones; all of which result in a range of severity. Also, “intellectual disabilities” and “behavioral problems” are very large buckets of different manifestations. In order to differentiate in the way that you are asking for, they would need to report exact diagnoses and give a detailed description of the individual to differentiate them, and even then, there would need to be a lot of context and clarification if they are to avoid misinterpretation or misunderstanding of any terms or descriptions used.

      • Fisk400@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m not saying it’s easy. When I say specific I just mean more specific than the huge bucket we currently have. Maybe 5 buckets so that this kid doesn’t need to share a bucket with the Nintendo kid i mentioned.

      • Fisk400@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m sure there is some middle ground we can find. His mother is named in the article and his actions were explained in depth so I don’t see a problem with being a bit more specific with what caused the behaviour. Especially when the phrase is also used to describe quite violent people.

        • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I have to wonder why you want a clearer picture of what the boy was suffering from, 'cause from my vantage point it seems it’s only to satisfy your own curiosity rather than solve a larger issue.

          Imo it’s none of our business what his diagnoses was as he was the victim here.

          • Fisk400@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            If it’s not relevant they dont need to bring it up. If it is relevant I would like to know what way it is relevant. I am fine with either but not both.

            Don’t forget that the reason I want there to be more detail is because they used the expression as an excuse for that guy that jumped the judge. A guy that was articulate and friendly right up until he turned feral. I think it is doing this kid a disservice to put these two very different people under the same vague header. It’s what they did with the r-slur and it’s why it’s considered a slur today.

            • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Again, in this particular instance he was the victim.

              Blanket rules in revealing diagnoses do not take into account individual’s right to privacy. I prefer to respect that right vs your request to know.

              • Fisk400@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                I don’t know why “a bit more specific” is being read as reveal his medical history.

                • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Because being specific is a breach of privacy. It’s really none of our business unless ofc one is a busybody.

  • gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    That mother deserves to cry until she bleeds to death from her tear ducts

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m not sure what you expected. You told the police about a crime, do you not expect them to arrest the criminal?

    • teegus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      If a cop in my country injected ketamine into a minor during an arrest it would be in the national news for weeks. Totally unacceptable.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Do they not treat children and adults differently in the legal system where you come from?

      This wasn’t a murder or any other violent crime. It was petty theft from a business committed by a minor.

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It takes a special mix of thin blue line bootlicking and thinking the world revolves around you to think this was a good idea.

    • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      For a petty theft committed by a mentally disabled minor?

      The situation was non-violent and under control - the cops escalated far beyond what was needed because they got bored waiting for the kid to fork over the last couple of e-cigarettes. There was no need to pin the kid to the ground, and definitely no need to inject them with ketamine.

      In a world where all cops weren’t bastards, they would have continued to build a rapport until they could convince the kid to give them back, give the kid a lecture about stealing, then let everyone be on their way.

      • VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s like some people don’t understand what community policing or policing by consent is. Cops shouldn’t be resorting to force unless they really have to and someone not handing over an e cig in no way warrants being tackled or restrained plus with neurodivergent people that only makes them more agitated which then obviously makes the situation worse.

        It’s not fucking rocket science that different situations call for different responses and some situations only really need a fucking talking or conversation.

        • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Exactly. In a sane world, cops shouldn’t ever be the ones escalating any situation, especially one where there is no on-going threat

  • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m 100% on board that this was unnecessary, but how should police handle something like this? It’s a 230 pound 14 year old hormonal teenager that turned sullen and refused to comply.

    Presumably the smart way would be to say “Ok your behavior is not ok but I’ll leave you be for now until you cool down.” and then just leave. I mean if you want to press charges you can come back any time. I don’t quite understand why in the US everyone is arrested instead of getting “a summons” (?).

    I’d also say that nicotine is often used for self medication by people with mental issues, including ADHD. Smoking is more prevalent. Vaping provides a much safer alternative. Not condoning 14 year olds vaping but it could explain why he wants them.

    • ???@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I’m 100% on board that this was unnecessary, but how should police handle something like this? It’s a 230 pound 14 year old hormonal teenager that turned sullen and refused to comply.

      USING WORDS.

      • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t think so. My guess is that sometimes the only way to deescalate is to leave someone alone. That’s what you’d have to teach police. But presumably only a qualified mental health professional can answer that question.

        • treefrog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Mental health student with his own emotional issues and that raised two small kids .

          Yes, often the way to desecalate is to take space. It’s anger management 101. If someone is not able to recognize they need space, the one able to should call for a time out (this is how time outs should be used by parents, not as punishment).

          Police are trained to exert authority. It’s not de-escalation training generally.

          Which is why mental health professionals should accompany police in situations like this.

          • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Thanks. Hmm, maybe police officers have mental health issues that prevent them from retreating and asserting their “authoritae”. Maybe no amount of training or accompanying will help with that.

            • treefrog@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Police are trained to ‘keep the peace’ in a lot of situations. Like, in a bad traffic accident, the cops are there to direct traffic while the EMTs and Firefighters take the lead.

              We just need to teach them to do the same with mental health workers and make that the standard for anything that’s not a criminal complaint. They already do this with stuff like CPS calls in a lot of jurisdictions.

              But yeah, a lot of cops are drawn to the job because they love power and authority. And it will take decades of restructuring of US policing to change that cultural tendency.

  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I feel the struggle, my little brother has been in and out of prison for years. He just has to be cool for a while, catch rides to work and the store, and he could pay off his fines and go back to normal life, but it always gets out of hand.

    Cops have no mercy in their soul.

  • zerog_bandit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Absolute definition of white privilege to think that calling the police to lecture her black son would yield positive outcomes.

    I say this as a white person.