"Protesters who wear masks could face arrest, up to a month in jail and a £1,000 fine under proposed measures that human rights campaigners claim are pandering to “culture war nonsense”.

Police in England and Wales will be given the power to arrest people if they are wearing face coverings at specific demonstrations, the Home Office has said."

Been a bad 18 months or so for privacy in the UK. Online Safety Bill passed, the right to take strike action curtailed, people in receipt of benefits (including disabled people) will soon (as from 2025) have their bank accounts open to the government, the right to protest curtailed and now this.

  • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Man its like the UK is an authoritarian shit hole or something. Y’all need weapons and resistance. And no, I’m not American before someone asks.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Protesters who wear masks could face arrest, up to a month in jail and a £1,000 fine under proposed measures that human rights campaigners claim are pandering to “culture war nonsense”.

    Police in England and Wales will be given the power to arrest people if they are wearing face coverings at specific demonstrations, the Home Office has said.

    The move is in direct response to the four protesters being cleared of criminal damage after toppling a statute of slave trader Edward Colston in Bristol in 2022 .

    Ministers will also make climbing on war memorials a specific public order offence, carrying a three-month sentence and a £1,000 fine.

    Shami Chakrabarti, the human rights lawyer and peer, said: “Should rape victims or refugees peacefully protesting really be punished for covering their faces to protect their identities?

    The home secretary, James Cleverly, said that recent protests had seen “a small minority dedicated to causing damage and intimidating the law-abiding majority”.


    The original article contains 681 words, the summary contains 158 words. Saved 77%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • li10@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I see no hope for this country. Things are just getting worse and worse every year, how long can this keep going?

    It’s pretty bad now, but I seriously worry what things will be like in 20 or so years.

    • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Tories on a any% speed run to the government from Children of Men, while the left is worried about which way Kier decides to lean that afternoon

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I lived in the UK not that long ago and I lived and live elsewhere in Europe.

        It really is a bigger problem in the UK than most of Europe, probably because it apes the US so hard and somehow combines some of its worst shit with their very own local shit (classism, very low social mobility, entrenched ancient elites, post-imperial hangover and other) rather than combining qualities.

        It’s mainly Anglon-Saxon countries that are speed running the rise of Fascism, not most of the World.

    • soviettaters@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      People hate on the US all the time, but the first amendment is very unique when you consider how other countries are curtailing people’s right to protest, practice their religion, etc.

      • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        lol you Americans thinking your little piece of paper written centuries ago makes you better than other countries is cute.

        Your country is not the beacon of freedom you pretend it is.

      • li10@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Pretty good if actually mattered.

        It’s a talking point that’s only upheld on political whim, which defeats the entire purpose of it.

      • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        An argument that might carry weight if you weren’t setting up hotlines for people to snitch on anything or anyone vaguely LGBTQIA+, removing books from libraries, allowing huge orgs to buy political favour, enslaving people in for-profit prison systems etc etc etc.

        • soviettaters@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago
          1. Kids shouldn’t be coerced into being gay.
          2. Yeah lobbying sucks I agree
          3. If people don’t want to have to work in prison then they shouldn’t commit crimes.
          • irmoz@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Kids aren’t being “coerced into being gay”. That’s a batshit statement right there.

            Also, slavery is always bad. End of story. Putting any leeway in there is disgusting.

          • jmankman@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            For the crime of homelessness, you are sentenced to a just lifetime of servitude in a for-profit prison. So righteous.

          • Restaldt@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Kids are not coerced in to being gay any more than geese are

            Lobbying sucks

            We are just ignoring the litany of false accusation and arrests of innocent people forced into modern legal slave labor?

            Better hope you never piss off the wrong cop or can afford a good personally retained lawyer if you do

  • ryan213@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hmm…I wonder which political spectrum the current government belongs to…

        • DessertStorms@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Exactly… (leaving both firmly on the right)

          Vote none, and start organising (in your work place, in your community, in your own home inspiring your kids). If you still can’t see that the system is designed by the rich and powerful for the rich and powerful, you’re not paying any real attention (precisely why the media keeps society constantly looking at anything but how things are really run).

          We need to abolish the establishments keeping us down, not continue to play their game by their rules and wonder why things never change…

          • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I hate kier but not voting for Labour would be stupid, protest votes or non votes don’t count any the only people pushing that idiocy are the rich right wing because they don’t want you to vote against them

            Everyone just thinks ‘oh look these people are too dumb, busy, or disconnected to vote oh well’

            You can still resist and work against a system you voted for,

          • mayooooo@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            You can vote as left as you can and still do whatever you are saying to do. Having ultraright nazi shits in power because you’re an internet idiot will not help you - in fact it will completely rob you of the chance to ever change anything. You dumb fucks will solve the world by not fucking voting, even if the game is rigged you don’t have to be the dumbest shit about it

            • DessertStorms@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Tell me you didn’t click the link without saying you didn’t click the link (hint: it literally tells people to vote).
              Also tell me you buy in to the distraction propaganda without saying you buy in to the distraction propaganda (hint: having a red tie on while not opposing a single piece of fascist legislation makes you, at the very least, a fascist enabler, or in reality, simply another fascist just one who is better at hiding it)…

              You’re literally giving a live demonstration of why continuing to play within their rules leads nowhere but deepening the divide within the working class.

              Blaming the people trapped in it, for the system keeping us all down, instead of those who created and benefit from it is one hell of a self destructive trick you’re doing for your overlords…

              Either way, you’re an ableist piece of crap, licking a boot because you’ve simply grown too comfortable with the feeling of it rammed down your throat, you have no high ground here. ¯\(ツ)

              • mayooooo@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                I’m not talking about the article, it’s about saying no. If I need to read the article that says yes when your link says no… I’m just sick of the onslaught of defetism online where a whole bunch of people have the idea they can just ignore reality and it’s all gona fix itself. But who cares right, will all be dead because of the climate wars so it’s all cool

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        That would mean taking a stance on an issue, which might alienate some voters somewhere.

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Whatever gets them votes. Actual conservatives would at least pretend to care about the economy.

      • admiralteal@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Why? Conservatism is about preserving traditional values and traditional power structures not the economy.

        If you actually care about the economy that means you care about progressing a more effective and efficient state for the benefit of the people. Afraid that makes you a progressive which the conservatives assure us they aren’t.

        • Kaboom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well if they were conservative and cared about traditional values, they wouldnt have let in so many migrants.

          • LookBehindYouNowAndThen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            What “traditional values” are you talking about?

            We’re a nation of migrants; you don’t get to rewrite history because it makes you mad.

            The first immigration law passed in this country was a process for naturalization; it doesn’t get more traditional than that.

        • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Conservatism is about preserving the status quo. (As opposed to reactionaries that want to restore the status quo ante)

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Not necessarily the current status quo though. Just the status quo where they have the most power.

  • erranto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I have never seen a cucked nation like the UK in the world before. u guys have no resistance what so ever ! the french should have bought you some freedoms a few centuries ago.

    • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s not even that - the people this is directly affecting (for now) are the people who, if they raise their head above the parapet, it’ll get shot off - the people least able to protest. 95% of the country are not lacking resistance, they’re lacking empathy and foresight. They show plenty of resistance to media driven culture war bullshit like immigration and LGBTQIA+ issues.

  • DessertStorms@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think it’s important to relate the latter part to the former - beyond the privacy issues with not being allowed to wear masks (and having our bank accounts invaded), there is also the health aspect, and disallowing masks is one sure fire way to keep disabled people from assembling, since, you know, we don’t want to get covid, being significantly more likely to die from it (not necessarily because of the illness, but because our lives are deemed less worth saving).

    The lack of any mask mandates already excludes disabled people from so many public spaces, this is just another way to keep us (as well as others, you know, first they came for…) from fighting back. as they strip us of every last human right.

    • skydivekingair@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not comparing, we have our own issues, but the US just said not wearing a mask in public is akin to not paying taxes or speeding - it’s still illegal and not free speech because it affects others.

  • Dran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s like they think V for Vendetta was a blueprint for how to run a utopia.

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Good luck enforcing this. I have a right to protest, and I also have an autoimmune disease that means I will wear a mask in public spaces on the advice of my doctor, especially when there’s a new strain of covid.

    Look forward to many, many federal cases under the Americans with Disabilities Act, dipshits.

    • Herbal Gamer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You know what I hate about it? I’ve always been quite the anglophile, but never saw the chance to move there because I was uneducated. Now they might even want me to come and I don’t think I want to anymore :(