The country will imprison or publicly flog 60 other suspected homosexuals.

  • This is what manufacturing consent looks like. Reminds me a lot of 2001 and 2002 during the war on Afghanistan and preparing for a war on Iraq.

    The West’s media is running overdrive to demonize Yemenis.

    • Maeve@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      And the opposing factions, supported by ksa, uae, usa would behave differently? I’m sure cutting off nearly all humanitarian aid under the last administration convinced them we’re more evolved.

      • Drusas@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m just pointing out that whoever posted this decided intentionally to leave the Houthi part out of the headline.

    • bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is like saying “The communist party in china” or “the rebels in the British colonies”. Like, at this point it’s a fairly decided who is in charge of Yemen, and it’s just a matter of waiting for the rest of the world to recognize the facts on the ground.

  • livus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s the Houthis in Yemen, not “Yemen”.

    Grazia Careccia, Amnesty International’s Middle East and North Africa Deputy Director, called the planned executions “gruesome public spectacles” designed to spread fear among LGBTQ+ people and the Yemeni population at large.

    • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yet when Biden bombs the Houthis, it’s “violation of international law” because the Houthis are the “de facto government of Yemen”. Or at least that was the consensus on Lemmy a couple months back.

      Like, I don’t really care. Fuck the Houthis and fuck Israel. But it’s interesting how the Lemmy hivemind picks and chooses who is “the legitimate Yemeni government” based on their personal values.

      • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Even more interesting how you are only capable of seeing things in black and white. Stoning people is bad. Bombing people is also bad.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Most people react to things emotionally, just as you’re doing. So many people will think as you do, “fuck Israel” and this leads people to think that every group in Iran’s “Axis of Resistance” are the good guys. Therefore attacking the Houthis (a part of the Axis of Resistance) is wrong.

        Rationalizations that stem from emotion results in some very strange outcomes.

      • livus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        What. Er, I have no idea what the Lemmy “hivemind” thinks on this (and was more or less taking a summer break from Kbin when the US started bombing the Middle East again).
        IMO there’s more than one consensus in news Lemmy depending if you’re on .ml or .world and what time of day it is.

        I was just pointing out that 1) it’s the Houthis, and 2) they seem to be trying to tighten their grip on the population.

        These seem like relevant points given the civil war.

        For the record I think the situation in Yemen is a travesty and, being super old, I have spent the past 20 years angrily watching as the US drone-bombed Yemeni civilians and ignored warnings that this radicalises people. Biden bombing now is the US military industrial economy business as usual.

          • livus@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            @sub_ubi “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”?

            I like the act of trying to stop a genocide. That doesn’t make me like other actions by whoever is performing the act.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    If your take-away is “this is why it was justified to genocide them” instead of “this is what happens when you genocide them” you’re a monster.

    • CybranM@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Your comment makes no sense, how is them stoning gays justifying (or being caused by) a genocide? The Ukrainians arent turning around and stoning their gay population because Russia is invading, its a really nonsensical thing to say.

    • SaltySalamander@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think “these are the monsters worthy of being genocided” fits better. Except for the fact that the Houthi’s aren’t being genocided. They’re being retaliated against, because they chose to attack other people. Really is simple as that.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes, the US was supplying weapons (via Saudi Arabia) to the government of Yemen that was fighting these fucking monsters.

        But relax, that war is in a ceasefire now, so everything is fine now, right?

        The world may not be the black and white simple thing you’ve been led to believe. Most of the time, if you do something, bad things will happen. If you do nothing, bad things will happen. Most of the time any course of action or inaction will have bad results. There are evil people in the world, and the US is not actually the source of all evil in the world. People have been coming up with reasons to do evil shit long before the US existed.

        If the US didn’t supply arms to the Yemeni government would things have turned out better? There’s no way to know that. The only thing that’s certain is the Houthis are horrible monsters.

  • CultHero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Barbarians.

    If you want to know why I’m an atheist.

    What kind of entity has 3 different sects of people who all believe this is what it wants?

    Religion is a cancer.

      • the post of tom joad@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        With all the respect i can muster, you are the one misunderstanding religion’s purpose.

        They are not.

        If organized religion ever helps humanity at all it is through the good people it inspires to help, the good part of humanity it brings out. The people who focus on that aspect of its tenets would always be good.

        But the book(s) and the men who wrote them are as full of power and venom as any other book, and the very idea that one is special by birth is disgusting and small. It is a venal thought shared by the religious and nazis alike.

        The cancer is organized religion. There is no bad apple within its core to root, it is itself the problem.

        and while the world will never be rid of its mind stifling influence, i will never stop dreaming of the shining day we grow beyond it

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    The Houthis aren’t the recognized government of Yemen.

    They control a large part of the country, and the civil war there is currently in a ceasefire. And of course they’re also attacking shipping in the Red Sea with a back and forth going on with the navies in a coalition led by the US.

    But let’s not give these assholes the legitimacy they want by considering them to be the government of Yemen.

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      So how would you word it differently? It seems that the article is portraying them as a strong power within the nation that is backed by Iran though.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The article’s headline is "Houthis in Yemen will publicly stone & crucify 9 gay men in “gruesome public spectacles”

        This is fine. Though the subheader says “The country will imprison or publicly flog 60 other suspected homosexuals”. Should be using words like “the group” or “the faction” not “the country”.

        Anyway, the link here is "Yemen will publicly stone & crucify 10 gay men in “gruesome public spectacles”

        Not sure the reason for changing it from the headline of the article. Perhaps the linked article did have the same headline as here when OP posted it, and they changed it because of similar feedback I’m making here. Don’t know if OP can change it now. Anyway, it’s been noted in by my comment and other comments, so I guess it’s fine.

        Such are the problems inherent in alternative media.

  • dan42O@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Great now let’s marginalize another community, next will be blind or deaf? And tie it to another nations Americans aren’t supposed to support.

  • TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    “Remember everyone we have to respect their beliefs…”

    Religious freedom can eat my asshole. Abolish it all, especially Abrahamic religions.

    • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s pretty easy to be a member of an Abrahamic religion and go your entire life without killing anyone.

      Don’t blame the structure for the monsters that abuse it.