• Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    In his unconventional style, Justice Engoron criticized Mr. Trump and the other defendants for refusing to admit errors for years. “Their complete lack of contrition and remorse borders on pathological,” he said.

    Borders. Sure.

    • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You would put a cesspit at the edge of camp so you would be as far as possible from the smell.

      His lack of contrition and remorse sits right knee deep in a cesspool border.

  • UnPassive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    “I’ll vote for him again because he isn’t like the other corrupt politicians”

    -My dad

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is actually a massive win.

      3 year ban from serving as an officer or board member, but doesn’t have to give up any companies, and retains ownership?

      Given the rampant corruption and fraud and how long it’s been going on; that’s the least that should have happened.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      And only banned from serving as an officer or director. Engoron cancelled the dissolution order, so he keeps his real estate holdings and his ownership interests.

        • ctkatz@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          but will they really? one, I can see A. LOT. more massive fines being applied here. he owes nearly a half BILLION in fines and penalties now.

          two, he’s no longer nominally in charge. if the monitor says assets need to be sold assets are getting sold.

          and three, being banned by new york from being on or running/owning any corporation is not an insignificant matter. in fact, it would say quite a bit if a company did associate with them after the penalty has expired. “junior and eric trump defrauded new york out of millions of dollars five years ago. you want to hire them on? what if they do that to us?”. were this in a state like wyoming or north dakota where no one lives and no one really cares it would be one thing. but this is in probably the financial capital of country, if not the world. being banned from doing business in a place where business is constantly happening is bad, and people will remember that.

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          He’s a cult leader. As long as he’s alive and has a platform, he’s useful for destabilizing the US.

          • jabjoe@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Dead, he’ll be a martyr to MAGA. I think the best hope is demographics, MAGA will age out.

            • Billiam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Trump is too much of a narcissist to be grooming his eventual successor. Which means that when he finally shucks off his flabby mortal coil, there’s going to be a power grab for control of the cult and they usually don’t survive that. Everyone from his children to Marjie Traitor Greene is going to claim they’re the heir to the MAGAt movement.

              • jabjoe@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Sure, but it soon be reaching a bit when MAGAs are dying of old age faster than new MAGAs are created.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Honestly, the whole ruling is utter bullshit based on both the amount of fraud and Trump and his lawyer’s behavior in court.

  • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Republicans: “man, I just can’t think of a better candidate than this convicted fraudster. He can defraud the world and make America great again, again, again.”

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    $354 million here…
    $83.3 million to E. Jean Carroll
    $5 million on the first E. Jean Carroll case…

    So $442,300,000 - Yow!

    • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      He better start writing some checks before there’s a land rush for Trump Tower.

      Because of the $100 million debt, Forbes magazine calculated the tower’s net worth at $371 million

        • ctkatz@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          from what I have read, this $450 million fine must come from assets, and not campaign funds.

          I don’t know about the e jean money, but for this he’s going to have to eat himself.

          and just remember, the republican national committee currently has $8 million in the bank in an election year, that the new leadership promises will 100% go to elect trump. the money that’s leftover from paying his legal bills that is.

          • hdnsmbt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            It irks me that while Trump is usually called by his last name, like all men, when people talk about women they casually use their first names like Hillary or, in this case, E Jean. It’s such a casual and mindless form of disrespect that few seem to notice.

            • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Is that broadly true? Hillary is Hillary because “Clinton” would obviously refer to Bill, since he was President. She also embraced the first name reference in her campaign materials. What about other famous women? Margaret Thatcher is Thatcher, J.K. Rowling as Rowling, Angela Merkel is Merkel. On the other side Bernie Saunders is Bernie. Perhaps calling someone by their first name is a sign of affection, not disrespect?

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Trump is a loser.
    This is the takeaway we need to impress on a MAGA crowd, that is immune to all the immorality and treason.

  • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I actually consider this a very big win for Trump.

    Literal decades of fraud that netted him billions in profits and he only has to pay back $300 million.

    Little decades of fraud, and he’s only banned from being an officer or director for 3 years. He gets to keep everything else.

    Once again a very rich person got away with decades of crimes and only had to give back a portion of the profits. $355 million is only a small portion of the money he has made in the past four decades.

    Guy should have been forced to cough up the full 375, and then permanently banned from doing any more businesses in the state. Anything else is a gift.

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I know Trump has done a lot of illegal stuff to make money over the years, but this trial is specifically about the over valuing of his properties in New York state. $300 million and loss of owning and operating businesses in the state, even temporarily, is a huge punishment for what he was on trial for.

      If only his many other trials end the same way then maybe he will have faced justice. We’ll have to see.

    • Guru_Insights99@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      A lot of those claims are made up lies from the democratic party, henceforth why Donald J. Trump the 45th president of the US (and should-be 46th) is in a trial now, quod the democratic party controls senate henceforth trial ensues against the last person standing in their way of political power

    • tristan@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m no expert by any means but I think once he’s kicked out of NY, it’s going to be pretty difficult for him to get back in.

      He also has the court appointed monitor for the next 3 years which he already complained is costing him money (by stopping him from committing more fraud).

      On top of that, banks will think twice before doing business with him in the future making it very difficult for him to make money without risking what he already has

      While I agree that it should have been much more, I think (well more of a hope) that the long term damage this will do will cost him and his family far more than if he never committed fraud in the first place… Then again, he’s shown an amazing ability to avoid consequences this far

      • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        He hasn’t really been kicked out, though. Has he? He’s banned from “serving as an officer or director of any New York corporation or other legal entity in New York for a period of three years” but the business certificates were not cancelled. The judge modified his original order from September to vacate the directive to cancel them. That means that when the monitor, who Trump is paying about $186,000/month, is done in three years, he’ll be back in control of it all.

        • Natanael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          He’s not allowed to control or direct the company for those 3 years, and the sum of the judgment might be enough to force the company to be sold off

          • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Maybe, but somehow I don’t think it’ll play out that way.

            I think one of two things will happen with the businesses. First, it may turn out that they owe so much because of the fraudulently acquired loans that they are not really profitable and will end up failing. They simply might not viable without the ongoing fraud. It’ll get particularly dicey if the banks Trump and his companies defrauded decide to use the ruling to demand that the loans be immediately repaid. I doubt that will happen, but it’d be fun to watch.

            On the other hand, Trump is such a bone head businessman that he could actually be richer if he’d just invested his inheritance in the stock market and not started his own businesses. This is a guy who managed to bankrupt multiple casinos. The saying, the house always wins, apparently doesn’t apply when Trump is running the house. Without his tiny, incompetent hands at the wheel, his companies might actually start running more efficiently. Whoever will be running them instead of Trump may just do a better job than him, since they won’t be so focused on committing crimes. Trump could actually make more money from them than he would otherwise.

        • tristan@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Oh… I misunderstood that part then, I thought that part of the order was still in place. That’s not as bad for him. My hope is that the monitor digs up a lot more dirt in that time and hands it over, like they did a month or so back

    • Dadifer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think the issue is that the prosecuter was unable to show that anyone was harmed from this fraud, and no company has been dissolved without showing direct harm to consumers in the past.

  • sunbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Come up with the money or secure a bond within 30 days

    Or what? Does anyone think he’s actually going to pay?

    He’s going to Alex Jones it at worst, and at best do the same but smarter.

    • elbucho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well, there wouldn’t have been prison in any case from this trial, as it was a civil suit, not a criminal one. But, he is facing 91 felony charges in total spread across a few cases that are currently working their way through the court, so maybe. Probably not. But maybe.

          • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Hurting his finances is arguably more effective. Going to jail makes him a martyr to his supporters, and he can appeal a criminal charge until he dies. Taking his money makes him a loser right now.

            Also, doesn’t a criminal fraud charge requires a victim, meaning a complainant that can show they have lost money as a result of the defendant’s actions? I’m sure those people exist, but that’s not what this particular trial was about. However, maybe others will come forward now that he has lost this trial.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    he’s only barred from controlling his businesses for 3 years? that doesn’t seem like a big deal

  • set_secret@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    doesn’t he like literally never pay debts or fines though? i mean this is for practical purposes useless.