• Dippy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Gods trying to get my friends to think about pushing politicians leftward on the scale of 4/6/8 years pissed them off. They will only focus efforts on yelling at Biden to drop out as if it will happen or help. They don’t care that no world exists where they are remotely happy in nov 2024, that’s the only thing they can think about

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Part of the problem the left currently faces, regardless of revolutionary thought in general, is that environmental concerns are past the election cycle.

      It is already too late to stop global warming at the 1.5 C target suggested in 2018.

      Gradual reform will be too late. There is no way around it, we are acting too slow, and even if every country in the world flipped Green or whatever in 2028 that might still be too late.

      • Dippy@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        “Too late” is the exact language the fossil fuel execs want you to use. Even if specific targets are passed, every fraction of a degree matters. Stopping warming at 2 is better than 2.1 so if electing Biden puts us on the 2°c track thats better, and maybe the 2028 candidate can put us on the 1.8°C track. Thats a difference worth fighting for

      • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        At least some believe that it was already too late in 2014 and our estimates are lagging about a decade. Not sure I believe that, but if true, it’s even more important to take action ASAP.

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is where the old adage “Don’t let perfect stand in the way of progress” applies.

      Biden may not even be considered progress by some, but at least he’s not a rapid sprint backwards into fascism.

  • frickineh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    these people already all fucking hate each other. They spend all their time arguing about minutiae

    Oh shit, The Onion has clearly infiltrated a few leftist groups in their time. That’s fucking hilarious.

  • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    “he’d already aroused suspicion by interrupting a meandering discussion of principles with a straightforward plan of action.”

    I feel seen.

    • underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      a) Organizations and Conferences

      1. Insist on doing everything through “channels.” Never permit short-cuts to be taken in order to expedite decisions.
      2. Make “speeches.” Talk as frequently as possible and at great length. Illustrate your “points” by long anecdotes and accounts of personal experiences. Never hesitate to make a few appropriate “patriotic” comments.
      3. When possible, refer all matters to committees, for “further study and consideration.” Attempt to make the committees as large as possible—never less than five.
      4. Bring up irrelevant issues as frequently as possible.
      5. Haggle over precise wordings of communications, minutes, resolutions.
      6. Refer back to matters decided upon at the last meeting and attempt to re-open the question of the advisability of that decision.
      7. Advocate “caution.” Be “reasonable” and urge your fellow-conferees to be “reasonable” and avoid haste which might result in embarrassments or difficulties later on.
      8. Be worried about the propriety of any decision—raise the question of whether such action as is contemplated lies within the jurisdiction of the group or whether it might conflict with the policy of some higher echelon.-
      • Followupquestion@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        The best part is by publishing this far and wide, anybody pushing for “careful consideration” and actual reasoned planning is immediately suspect, which leads to less reasoned decisions, which usually means more mistakes. If a victory is somehow won through violence of action and not careful planning, the support structure isn’t there to maintain the victory, nor are the people who win that victory well-suited to careful planning before the next engagement. The boring stuff is often what wins wars, simple things like plenty of fuel, adequate hygiene facilities, and dry socks can literally mean the difference between a division surrendering or winning a battle.

      • The_v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        TIL that the OSS completely undermined the global business culture.

        Those bastards!!!

  • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    doing something violent to the communal spaces in their community

    That seems counterproductive, let’s do something violent to the fash spaces in our community.

        • Followupquestion@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s hard to justify infiltrating activist groups like Food Not Bombs if they never plan an attack on a federal building. For a fun listen, the second season of Bundyville talks about a small group with “anti-government” leanings and how the Feds tried to encourage them to act violently. My favorite part is when one Fed texted another Fed questioning their exact plan, because the cell of five members had multiple Feds! Multiple Feds to infiltrate and influence (what’s the exact line for entrapment I wonder) a small number of people and even then they were ineffective. I guess there weren’t enough lonely autistic teens in the group.

    • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yet it still ends up as:

      Left-wing groups: Beaten and arrested by police for peacefully protesting.

      Right-wing groups: Attempt to overthrow democracy, get off scot-free.

      • Dr_Satan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Buildings burn and people die when overthrow is attempted. Therefore that’s exaggeration.

          • Dr_Satan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Look at those downvotes.

            What did I say that was so bad?

            What do you think is going on here?

            • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              You stated that “overthrow” is an exaggeration because buildings didn’t burn or whatever. That’s not the definition of overthrow.

              The fact is, people tried to overturn the US Presidential Election by extralegal means including force, with the intent of putting in place an illegitimate leader. That meets the definition of overthrow and insurrection.

              Of course, if you are operating on right wing propaganda instead of facts, you won’t agree.

              And if your epistemology is clouded with superstitious thinking and unchecked cognitive biases, you won’t ever be able to see through the bullshit.

      • DdCno1@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        get off scot-free

        Given how they are being systematically hunted down and sentenced to long prison sentences one after the other and from the bottom up, I don’t think this is accurate.

        • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Commission data show that the D.C. court’s sentences for Jan. 6 defendants who assaulted police is below the national average.

          Since Jan. 6 cases began, the average sentence imposed by D.C. federal judges in the Capitol attack under guidelines for serious assaults climbed to 46 months from 41 months but is still below the nationwide average of 51 months in 2022.

          As of last month

          Even directly assaulting cops got these fuckers below average sentences, let alone the literal act of trying to overthrow democracy.

            • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              When I was teenager, I got a speeding ticket in a different state and ignored it. Several months later, I got a notice that my home state was going to suspend my license over it unless I dealt with it within a month. Because I had skipped my court date, the only way I could do that was to drive 10 hours, show up early to court, and request that the DA and judge add my case to the docket.

              So, I drove overnight, showed up early, and they agreed to hear my case. In the state I was in, at triffic court they have you stand in line and when you’re 3rd in line the ADA asks your name and pulls your file to the top and the DA then reads the charges out load when it’s your turn.

              As I’m next in line, the DA starts reading the case of the person in front of me and it’s almost identical to mine. We were both clocked going significantly over the speed limit (I was actually going slightly faster), we were both from out of state, and we had both failed to appear to our scheduled court date. The judge hit him with a $200 fine and $150 court fee that would be reduced to $100 if it was paid on the spot in cash. I began to panic. I only had $250 until my next paycheck and my license was due to be suspended before then. I could barely hear the DA read off the details of my case over my pulse in my ears. The judge listened then announced my fine: $75 plus the court fee.

              The only difference between myself and the person in front of me was our race. Yes, we were in a southern state and, yes, the judge was an old, white man.

          • gmtom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Not to defend these guys, but be careful when using statistical averages and drawing conclusions from them when you dont have the other contextual data.

            Like for example sentencing guidelines give leniency to first time offenders, so If the sample of Jan 6 traitors has more first time offenders than the nationwide average, then we would expect them to have a shorter average sentences. I cant read the article you posted so I dont know if this is considered at all.

            • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              That’s a valid point and one I hadn’t considered. I’ll certainly keep that in mind for future, as I do like statistical data.

          • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Not awesome. But at least somewhat better than not being tried at all. Which is kind of what I expected going in.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          In what prison Putin is now? Here’s the answer.

  • OpenStars@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    img

    To be fair, the journey of a thousand miles does - or at least should - not begin with a single step, but rather with figuring out which direction to go in.

    • OpenStars@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I want to add much more detail to my own reply, so here goes:

      I recall a story that I read on the site-that-shall-not-be-named where this guy ran a business, and he tried to be part of the solution but after dealing with people’s dumb-shitty-STUPIDNESS he just gave up. The issue is that due to capitalism, many pricing structures in the USA are enormously opaque with tons of hidden fees (like internet service for “$5” - plus also $100 in fees that they don’t tell you about in advance). Rather than a price such as “$1.99 + tax”, which depending on area could be I dunno lets say $2.17, he instead sold his wares (whatever they were) for “$2 flat”. So not only did he single-handedly fix the opaqueness issue, at least in his own business, but he offered the item for LESS than the competition.

      But… - can you spot where this is going? - people chose the $1.99 + tax option, b/c when you sort online by “price”, 1.99 + tax shows up above the $2 flat price, even when the former is actually $2.17 after tax so the latter is significantly lower cost.

      i.e., There are REASONS for why things are the way they are. And we ignore these at our peril. Case in point: Trump did not “win” in 2016 so much as Hillary Clinton lost. And now we are going to try the same experiment again in 2024… Trump vs. democracy. All they have to do is keep playing the Russian Roulette game - the odds are, after all, in their favor.

      So back to this aforementioned business guy: he gave up. I think he went out of business entirely rather than just caving in to do the same pricing structures that everyone else did. He apparently could not both fight the system and win, so he lost both instead.

      But that begs the question: if he had just “advertised” his “prices” as $1.82 (or whatever price would, when combined with taxes, even out to $2 flat) online, but then when people walk in the door there are signs saying like “just pay $2 flat”, could he have succeeded? i.e., if he had flexed just a little, would it have saved his business? We will never know I suppose, nor am I advocating for caving in especially as it pertains to ethical matters - I have walked away from jobs rather than cave on such a line, so I mean it when I say that I am NOT suggesting to do so at all costs!!!

      It is not enough to have a desire to save the world, or even your own little corner of it. THEY won’t let you. I think that is why liberals fight amongst ourselves so much though: b/c while it is SO VERY EASY to fail, it is so very hard to get an answer correct. Like to the question of “what is 1+1=?”, there are so MANY wrong answers, but only one CORRECT one. And even fewer when you factor in economic and other business necessities.

      That is why I am super impressed with the job that Biden is doing. Walking that tightrope is HARD. But the media does not seem to report on half of the positive stuff that he does, so I fear that Trump will win this next election as a result. It is not enough to make the hard calls - you apparently also have to be the right kind of clown that drives clickbait engagement media stats that brings media corps higher profits too. All I know is that whatever comes next, we absolutely seem to deserve all of it, b/c we brought this on ourselves.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’m a member of a smallish leftwing party in my own country and having over 20 years professional experience in various industries and several countries it really riles me just how damn incompetent and disorganised they are - I mean, most have their hearts in the right place (even if they easilly succumb to serve their own petty emotional needs, like ego, rather than principles), but damn even how they go about fighting the problems in the country (pretty much 100% reactive) and the organisation and quality of the material in their campaigns is really frustratingly “amateur hour, every hour of they day, every day of the year”.

    Funnilly enough a leftwing part I was a member of in another country I lived in was also a lot “good intentions but very naive and a bit lost”.

    PS: Note that all this might be just the bias from never having been a member of a rightwing party. Maybe they’re all just as bad and judging by professional standards the typical political party invariably leads to the conclusion they’re pretty inept.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Meeting a new leftist who shares your values, knows their stuff and has amazing potential

      two panels: spongebob normally then with small eyes

      Something sets them off and they start spouting neo-fascist propaganda about “tankies”

      True story.

    • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      For real. It hits way too close to the truth. The thing is, they can use as much power and as many tools as they want to try and infiltrate/destroy dissent, but they can never actually change the basic nature/desires of the human animal, so even when they’ve crushed all organized efforts to oppose their rule, resistance will still arise more and more frequently the farther they go in their attempts to consolidate power. Ultimately you invariably get what exists today: an epic cluster fuck of splinter groups and causes across the political spectrum.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    IIRC this has actually happened. Cops got little more than a map of who’s blocking who, and gave up because there’s just… there’s just so much reading.