• extant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Businesses shouldn’t be allowed to purchase residential houses, they can do apartments but no family homes, even if it’s split.

    Political donations should be illegal except from a private civilian who must follow all rules and limitations. If a corporation thinks a specific politician is in their best interest the corporation’s then the only option should be employees should be the ones to donate their personal money up to their limit and not funded from the company itself, a business or pact should have no sway in an election and should only be influenced by individual voters. That way the individual can decide if that politician is best suited for the country or just their business.

  • dragontangram88@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I wouldn’t be opposed to any of these, except I would question streamlining work visas. I wouldn’t want our country to bypass background checks, or other security measures by shortening the time needed to streamline those visas.

    Oh, and something that would help me greatly (not sure how others feel), but an automatic investigation into any claims of being bullied out of employment by gangs, or other such groups. I don’t know if others have experienced this situation, but when you’re poor, going through divorce proceedings, have children to raise, are sinking in debt, and dealing with health problems, the last thing you need is to have some local gangs bully you out of work with death threats. Your plan looks fine, but I also need a guaranteed safe place to live and work, and no politician seems to want to address this topic because it isn’t about money, or some measure on the ballot.

  • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I like it, so I know it’ll never happen. Some gun control would be nice too. And $20 fed minimum is probably too much

  • setInner234@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Collateral for loan is realised gain. Nice. I always wondered what a good mechanism against that kind of tax cheating would be.

    • TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      How about ending step-up basis and have the taxes in gains taken from the estate before inheritance?

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    youd be better off making a plan to seize power.

    those measures are good and all but your current kings wont let it happen.

  • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Abortion is important, but constitutional amendments are difficult so let’s make it count: bodily autonomy. This includes abortion but also assisted suicide, personal drug use, tattoos, gender reassignment, and much more.

    • esc27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I feel like that could backfire. The antivax movement would use it to try and kill off all compulsory vaccinations leading to a resurgence in otherwise rare diseases. ERs would hesitate to perform lifesaving operations without consent over fear of being sued later.

      Then there is the question of who makes bodily autonomy decisions for children and people unable to make decisions for themselves. If parents, you could see an increase in religiously motivated mutilations. If the state…

      • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        People already do medically unnecessary genital mutiliaton to babies (circumcision). Parents have autonomy over their children until they reach the age of reason, or they become legally adults. I think pregnancy would have to create legal adulthood.

        ER and Good Samaritan laws already indicate that when unresponsive, consent to save a life is implied. You can do CPR on an unresponsive person without repercussions.

        For the vaccines, people should definitely be free not to do it, but then they are not admitted to public school. They are quarantined when they go to a hospital. They cant travel on airplanes or public transit. Just like you’re free to get face tattoos but some people might not want to look at you. Should we outlaw face tattoos? No, that should be unconstitutional. I don’t have a face tattoo and I don’t think anybody should, but I would fight for their freedom to make their own choice. It doesn’t have to be a good decision, it just has to be their own decision.

        Of course there are details to hash out and decide in the courts, but that is the case with all good rights, even freedom of speech.

        • esc27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          You are more optimistic than I am. I worry a particularly “slanted” Supreme Court might interpret school vaccine requirements, quarantine, etc. as coercive violations of bodily autonomy.

          Maybe if the amendment had a limited public heath exception and some protections for doctors. But the wording would be tricky.

          • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            After what China allegedly did during Covid, I think we should think very carefully about the specific conditions of a legalized and forced quarantine.

            • esc27@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yeah, that’s why any exception would have to be narrow and carefully worded and I’m not even sure it would be possible.

              Both risks are pretty bad. Make the protections too strong and people will abuse the privilege. Too weak and governments will abuse the exceptions.

              Eh, maybe I’m overthinking it. Even the first amendment is understood not to protect certain kinds of speech. Although sometimes I wonder if those exceptions could survive if directly challenged in our modern situation…

      • whereisk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        A few years ago I would have said the courts would impose sanity over these extremes but that no longer applies.

  • rsuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Carbon tax, eliminate cheap/free parking, congestion tax in cities. Using the roads and causing noise/danger to others while polluting should never be cheaper than using public transportation (not counting parking, which should be it’s own private cost not passed on to society).

  • untorquer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Mass transit buss, train, continuous across the country (inter/intra state, city, etc…)

    Pedestrian and bike infrastructure, continuous and shielded from motor vehicles, in part or supplement to all main roads, highways, etc…

    End and roll back privatization of public services

    Universal pre-K

    After school activities funding

    Safe third places for teens/young adults (malls? Pools? Idk what kids are into these days)

    Free adult education (community college subsidy, Library programs, etc…)

    Etc…

  • esc27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Voting holidays tend to be a problem because many of the people least able to take time to vote would be considered “essential” and still end up working on the holiday.

    Better to make voting holidays entirely unnecessary by relying on vote by mail and a week long opportunity to drop of ballots at secure locations.

    Also, you might be able to simplify the voting method a bit by just requiring a candidate to win a majority (not plurality) of the votes. This would encourage districts to explore alternatives to first past the post because otherwise they would constantly need runoff elections.

    • 3volver@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Voting day being a holiday would be mostly symbolic. It also helps to ensure that there is no discrimination around the UBI bonus for voting. If an employer forced an employee to work on voting day then it would be grounds for a lawsuit because it’s a holiday. And yes, there would be weeks to vote by mail and vote early in person ahead of the actual voting day.

  • z00s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Wow that’s a lot

    Even if you got elected on that platform, you’d be lucky if you could push even one of those things through in an entire political career, even if it’s something popular that the people want.

    It’s a classic trap for the newly elected who promise the world and then realised that 99% of politics is horse trading and backdoor deals with beltway insiders

  • Ersatz86@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    End qualified immunity for cops, increase minimum training requirements, and institute federal licensing scheme to increase accountability, along with mandatory malpractice insurance coverage.

    None of these standards are more strenuous than the ones I have to meet for my non-LEO job.

  • pearable@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    The vast majority of these will not come to pass if the government is not in active fear of revolutionary change. That is the only time they will be convinced to budge from the status quo.

    A similar thing happened in the 30s in the US. Most people don’t know that FDR was a trust fund kid and the inheritor of a fortune. The only reason he did the reforms was to prevent the country from going commie. Enough of the other capitalists fell in line. Those who didn’t, tried to install a military dictator, it’s called the Business Plot. Some of the smarter ones founded the John Birch Society, created various nonprofits, and selected religious leaders to empower with bags of cash. From there they slowly created the media, education, religious, and cultural right wing ecosystem that claimed the political system in the 70s.

    If we don’t want a similar claw-back of power we need to ensure it doesn’t happen again. We need to make sure no one is capable of corrupting media, education, religion, and culture at such a scale. I’d argue we need to eliminate the ability for people to own the means of production. After that is done almost every other problem we have as a society will be easier to manage.

  • BallsandBayonets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Prohibit the owning of residential property by all non-individuals, and require individuals to have a minimum of a 70% minimum residency requirement on the one residential property they own.

    Age cap on all elected positions.

    The total elimination of all for-profit war manufacturing.

    A wealth cap set to some reasonable percentage above the poverty line.

    Immediate trials for crimes against humanity for all existing billionaires and most C-level employees of all energy, “defense”, pharmesutical, utility, media, and mass conglomerate corporations.