cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/15183880

Well it wasn’t just Trump loyalists; it was 19 Republicans in the Freedom Caucus (who are indeed Trump loyalists) and almost all the Democrats voting agains bringing the current bill to the floor. Now what?

“Congressional sources tell WIRED they have no idea what the next steps will be.”

Oh.

  • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I have never been so conflicted about a news story

    Like hey hooray, congress did something good!

    Wait

    Wait

    Did they?

    • GuerillaGorillas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The framing of it is odd when it was just 19 Republicans making up the 228 no votes largely by Democrats. I get that they were probably just motivated by Trump’s social media ramblings but it seems like this was a Democrat win for privacy rights.

      • Beemo Dinosaurierfuß@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t think that applies here.

        The democrats oppose this spy tool because it is badly regulated and prone to abuse.
        The Trump loyalists oppose this spy tool because it may expose some of Trumps crimes and treason.

  • crusa187@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Absolutely the right thing, but for the wrong reason of course.

    I’ll still celebrate this win - warrantless wiretapping is not ok, never was, and I’m glad if this results in FISA being put to rest.

  • malloc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    One of the few actions coming from Trump and his band of cock suckers.

    Fuck domestic spy programs. Fuck FISA.

    Tear all of it down.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I guess I don’t understand the vitriol here. This is spying on foreign nationals who have dealings with citizens. Are we under the impression that Trump is the only traitor? Because it looks to me like even with FISA we have a fuck load of foreign agents in our country including politicians, military folks like General Flynn, Giuliani, Kushner - and that’s only Trump’s orbit.

      There are clearly massive intelligence operations penetrating the country successfully. I don’t want to be a puppet of a fascist foreign government any more than I want to be controlled by a fascist domestic one. I’m a hell of a lot more scared of that than FISA, but maybe there’s an angle I’m missing. Any problem I have with FISA begins with the fact that it is clearly an utter failure. If you’re going to spy on folks, prosecute the fucking bad guys. Someone want to explain their point of view or is this just something I’m out of sync with the left on?

    • fiercekitten@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Hey, no need to disparage cock suckers by equating them with Trump and his loyalists. Being a cock sucker shouldn’t be an insult.

  • Veraxus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Spying on our own citizens is unconstitutional (illegal search).

    However, everything a public official does or says should be considered public record and a basic requirement for holding office.

  • Pretzilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s obvious he doesn’t want to be caught in the act of selling all the ‘missing’ classified docs he’s still hiding

    And the rest of his traitorous collaborations

    • neatchee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t care how much dirt FISA could enable us to dig up on Trump, the trade isn’t worth it. It’d be the epitome of biting off your nose to spite your face

      • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I didn’t like the patriot act and this seems like a loophole to doing patriot act things. It needs to apply to foreign protections and not citizens. Never thought id say it, but I have to agree with magas On this one. Most likely the magas don’t appreciate the law spying on them and don’t. care about the citizens.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t think anyone needs more evidence that Trump is a crook; I think the concern is that Trump is enough in cahoots with for-real foreign adversaries who are at odds with FISA-authorized surveillance (as it makes real operational problems for them), and they might be telling him how badly he needs to kill this to weaken it. He usually doesn’t get anywhere deep into policy on this kind of stuff. Unless someone smarter than him is telling him what’s important, he just talks about windmills and toilets and Crooked Hillary and how the election was stolen.

        I honestly don’t know whether it’s that, or whether he’s having an unexpected interest in policy details just because it came to his attention somehow and he knows the US national security apparatus is bad because it was mean to him. It could be either one.

        • neatchee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          “Cool story. Still murder.” I have really serious problems with how FISA has been used in the past. I usually could go either way on authorizing state surveillance but it has been abused too much for me to be comfortable keeping it around in its current form

          As far as trump is concerned, even a broken clock is right twice a day

          • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yeah. And it could be both – it could be both a useful tool for law enforcement to wiretap foreign adversaries, and also a convenient loophole if they want to track protest organizations where one of the members sometimes calls his brother who lives in France or whatever. Russia/Trump would only care about the first, and someone who’s chiefly concerned about civil liberties in the US would only really care (or even be aware of, by definition) about the second.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I hope Fat Fuck thinks this stops them watching what he’s doing lol.

    1. He’s under indictment, so they are watching his every movement

    2. This act was only the thin law flavored covering over what our spy agencies do.

    Dont get me wrong, Im glad it got shot down, but they absolutely are and still will be watching what everyone is doing, especially in regards to our adversaries.