• Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The “distributions” argument always smells like bullshit. Developers actually interested on supporting Linux usually stick to one or two distros of their choice. (Typically Ubuntu.)

    Beyond that: I don’t play LoL, but the fact that they need such an aggressive rootkit as anti-cheat hints poor game design. As in, why are your players so eager to cheat?

    • howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m guessing that people just like feeling superior to others and video games are a convenient outlet for that. There’s no changing that via game design unless LoL ceases to be a competitive game.

    • rollmagma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Typical for a group of people that probably dedicated their whole careers to Windows. Could have just put it plainly that they don’t want to pay engineers that have the skills to do this on Linux.

    • yukichigai@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The “distributions” argument always smells like bullshit. Developers actually interested on supporting Linux usually stick to one or two distros of their choice. (Typically Ubuntu.)

      My thoughts exactly. It is not unheard of at all for Linux ports to only be guaranteed to function on specific distros. It’s well within the realm of possibility and this is not a real stumbling block at all.

    • mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s more likely an admission they have to trampoline every gpl function in the kernel which isn’t really easy to do and would let that kernel module run on any other kernel. Otherwise they would have to do a shim like nvidia which would mean a whole other level of issues like saying we support Linux but only Ubuntu which as a non Ubuntu user would mean to me they do not in fact support Linux. I’d vote with walle here but I already don’t own this game as my friends said the user base is terrible years ago but this just means there is no reason to buy any of their games.

  • WereCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t believe that only 800 people played on Linux. It makes no sense to me in the grand scheme of things. I have a personal YT channel with only 108 subs and my random low effort video on how to get League running on Steam Deck has almost 70k views which is nuts and there are many other much better videos than mine with many more views. If only 0.1% of those people are active players that would still make a lot more than “800” figure. I know this is just a random speculation but 800 is just waaaay too low.

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Those 70k views are probably people like me:

      Want to try it and bounce violently off of the toxic ass community

      So that 800 might actually be a believable number given you go through some hurdles just to get, well, LOL players

  • Willdrick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Good riddance, spent several years hooked to League. That being said, the fragmentation argument is bullshit, they could ship a read-only container in a flatpak and it’d run everywhere.

    Kernel level is a huge risk and it doesn’t guarantee anything, especially in the age of Ai cheats and network mitm cheats

      • Willdrick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s the point. A read only container to keep low hanging fruit at bay, and flatpak to distribute without having to repackage to every distro under the sun.

        I don’t fuck with the game, the game doesn’t fuck with my system.

  • mryessir@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I just read from that: Other OSes are inferior and they won’t tell their userbase. Cheapshots I guess.

  • tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    How far is the company willing to go to prevent cheating? Cameras in people’s homes to make sure they’re not using another computer that you have no access to?

    If players tolerate that then competitive gaming is going in a deeper dark pit of proprietary spyware in the name of fighting cheating, an arms race with no end.

    • okamiueru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      What makes you think they are referring to Wine in that particular case, and not the emulation of the kernel level anticheat on userland? It’s also arguably not an entirely correct use of the word there either, but it’s fine.

      • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        What makes you think they are referring to Wine in that particular case.

        Them talking about Lutris and Wine in that same paragraph and using the phrasing “even allowing” implying it’s what they’re currently doing. But looking again, you’re right. They were referring to VMs.

  • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    yesterday, there were just over 800 Linux users on League.

    And how many of them were cheating? ರ⁠_⁠ರ

    • pandacoder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The number would be higher too, I doubt I was the only one who stopped playing months ago when Vanguard was supposedly going to be implemented imminently.

      • yggstyle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        You and me both.

        Fun fact: you could get an account locked in under an hour if you used a command line to close the league client. Not powershell - just good ol cmd. No reports needed. Reproduced it 4 times in 2 days… Lots of fun emails with initially the support teams and then the devs. Apparently “taskkill” is the most nefarious cheat known to the gaming industry.

        A grade schooler with a “learn programming in 24 hours” book could probably produce better cheat detection.

    • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      And Vanguard is already being bypassed by using external tools. IIRC I saw a video about it where the cheater had the hack running on a completely separate computer.

  • howrar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve never actually noticed cheaters during the time I played the game. If they cheat and matchmaking puts me against them, it just means that me without cheats and them with cheats are equivalent in skill level, so it’s a fair and fun game. So I don’t see the point in preventing cheats in the first place unless you’re at the very top of the ladder, and there’s so few people up there that it should be easy to just manually ban the cheaters.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think a part of it is the difference to losing to something “reasonable” vs “unreasonable.”

      If you’re clearly really bad at the game when we are in a fight with line of sight but somehow you keep picking off my teammates through walls… That’s the kind of thing where cheating really starts to get annoying.

      You may still be on the same skill level overall, but for specific parts of the game they have super powers, and it just feels ridiculous.

      Smurfing is also a real issue because cheaters seem to overlap with trolls that just want everyone else to have a bad time, so they’ll spend a bunch of time down ranking, so they can spend a little time giving a lot of players a bad day.

      • howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think a part of it is the difference to losing to something “reasonable” vs “unreasonable.”

        Yeah, that’s understandable. I just don’t think there’s an equivalent in LoL that would feel particularly unfair. At worst, someone just knows where you are at all times. What do you do with that information? That requires good game knowledge. You can only influence a small portion of the map yourself and teammates tend to like acting independently even if you provide them with extra info.

        Smurfing is a bigger problem, but I’ve found that Riot tends to be very good at gauging your skill level even if you intentionally sandbag. LoL is just one of those game where it’s really hard to convincingly pretend to be bad at it.

  • loo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    My main issue with this blog post is that rather than properly addressing concerns, they make fun of them.

    It’s not a rootkit, journalists just spread misinformation for clicks

    Why is it not a rootkit, then??

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I guess the difference is in whether or not the victim was complicit with installing spyware in the kernel.

    • yggstyle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      A blog toxic as it’s community? Gasp.

      A long while back riot used to be a fun sorta disruptive thing that was pretty healthy overall. It was awkward and fun. That was before it was purchased though. Now riot exists to make money for big china. It isn’t that company anymore. It’s a facade.

      You can’t fix it, nor can the employees.

      Riot is a skinpuppet that has no autonomy. Unlike the employees though, we have the choice to leave that failing franchise and move on. Rootkits aren’t acceptable and that needs to be the standard. It wasn’t okay when Sony tried it in the name of anti-piracy and it’s still not okay now. No person should be okay with installing a black box with greater admin rights than they have on their own machine. That is not okay. It is security heresy. That blog uses hand waving and bullshit to sell the concept to people that don’t know any better. And honestly? That’s almost just as bad as the rootkit itself.

      A rough translation is:

      Be a good drone and put the slave collar on. It’s good for you. Don’t ask questions, you don’t need to know why. Just do it. You are the product and you have no rights.

      • slumberlust@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I disagree that they went downhill post-purchase. They were shit from the very start when pendragon decided to burn one community to promote his own in the name of capitalism.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    “linux does not allow us a good enough ability to confirm boot state”

    Skill issue, L for riot games.

    Realistically, if this is true, it’s because of security. Shocker on that one really. Also, there are probably only 800 players on linux because the anti cheat doesnt fucking work. But that doesnt count apparently

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Skill issue, L for riot games.

      I’m no expert here, but couldn’t they rely on SEV/SME or similar? My understanding is those features encrypt RAM, which would make it a lot more difficult for an attacker to do memory-based attacks when the game is running within a VM. I expect “physical attacks” would include attacking a VM’s memory, but again, I’m not an expert.

      I also wonder if this could work in a containerized environment instead of a VM, so players could just run a lightweight container and preserve direct access to resources like the GPU. I don’t know if GPU access can be required to be encrypted as well, but surely this is a massive step forward.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        i have no clue myself frankly. Realistically, doing literally anything is probably going to be better than what riot claims is possible. I think a fundamental part of the problem is stuff outside the control of the game, the OS already has segmented ram for instance, it’s all supposed to be virtually privatized, that way you don’t get these kinds of problems On the fly encryption would probably help, though they would probably just use shitty encryption anyway. Regardless, if you get something to hook into the game code itself, rather than just abusing memory values, it wouldn’t matter. Because at that point it’s going to be running inside the game.

  • Norgur@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    So … do we have any evidence that rootkits actually decrease the amount of cheating? Like… At all?

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    So basically, “it’s too hard, and our engineers are not good at their jobs.”

    • fluckx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s Harder to solve than you think. I came upon a documentary a while ago where they go a bit more in depth on the subject and what cheaters can do nowadays.

      No company has solved the problem tbh. Even games like counter strike are riddled with cheaters and even on faceit there’s plenty of people that are dodgy AF and likely cheat.

      It’s not an easy problem to solve and it is, AFAIK, still an unsolved problem in shooters. So your comment is a bit salty. Might as well claim every game engineer worldwide isnt good at their job because nobody has solved this yet. Not that I’m defending riot.

      The rootkit “solution” is complete bullshit. It is completely disproportionate and a massive security/privacy risk. And to top it off it’s not even a solution that’s good enough.

      This is the documentary I saw: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwzIq04vd0M&

      It did remove my appetite for playing PvP shooters for a while.

      • yggstyle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The rootkit isn’t a solution. It’s a bandaid - and a bad one at that. Moba and FPS hacks have already moved outside the hardware of the PC or into the virtual space. It’s a beware of dog sign on the fence meant to scare users… while ultimately doing very little (besides providing a vector real hackers and tools can exploit to gain access to your system.)

        Seriously anyone willing to install a rootkit on their system that that company is behind deserves whatever comes their way next.

        • fluckx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I fully agree with that. It’s why I quoted “solution” in the first place.

      • hperrin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m sorry but I just don’t buy that.

        First of all, you can’t solve a problem you’re not willing to work on.

        Second, no one is expecting a solution that bans 100% of cheaters and has zero false positives. We all know that’s unrealistic. So saying no one has solved it yet is kind of misleading. There are existing solutions that work well enough for most people.

        Third, there are solutions that can run entirely on the server side that would work for every system. Riot just isn’t willing to use them.

        My comment stands. Bad engineers that can’t solve a problem other people have already come up with solutions for.

      • apt_install_coffee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Given the user always has a deeper access to the client (i.e. hardware access) than the anticheat dev does, eliminating cheating is probably unsolvable.

        Best bet is probably always going to be a decently funded team dedicated to find and ban cheaters, rather than attempting to prevent them all with a rootkit.

  • yggstyle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    tldr for anyone:

    They aren’t fixing it. fuck y’all.

    Also - it’s not a rootkit - it just loads at boot and has higher privileges than the userspace that you can’t contr… oh. it’s a rootkit. They don’t want you to call it that though. It’s not cancer… it’s a growth.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      at this point i want to cheat on an approved, bare-metal windows machine, just as a fuck you.

      but then i remember this game is awful and i dont wanna touch it anyway.

      • yggstyle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Funnily enough that’s how a lot of modern cheats work. it’s on a separate box. Good luck catching that automatically vanguard. Hard to out-ring the hardware layer.

        If it’s not server based detection it’s exploitable.

        I’m not in that line of work but make no mistake if it hasn’t been yet: a cheat vector will probably involve patching the anti cheat software or attacking how it communicates.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          there are arduino-based cheats now, you dont even need an expensive box, it hijacks your mouse for aimbots and such. thinking of putting one of mine to use.

          • yggstyle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yep, this is what I was referencing in other responses. Purely from a solution perspective it is positively the ultimate “get bent” from the cheat community. Add in some randomness and suddenly there’s zero difference between a ‘good session’ and scripting.

            Next up: sorry you don’t have xyz brand mice you can’t play our games. Consumers get forced to buy shit they don’t want or need and meanwhile the cheat / hack community release a patch to emulate it.

            It’s the same old cat and mouse game. There are solutions - but a rootkit isn’t it.

            • umbrella@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              not looking forward to mice DRM of all things. but then it will be funny to see their games wilt because most people don’t own the xyz hardware they require. im willing to bet arduinos can fake hardware ids too.

  • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Fuck Riot. Never playing their games again. If you’re going to have a shitty anticheat at least give people the option to play in anticheat disabled lobbies. Besides, they should be doing anticheat at the server level not spying on the boot sequence of client PCs. That shit is unnecessary for a fucking banking app let alone a goddamn game. It’s just a game, let us enjoy it rather than making such a ridiculously over the top response to cheating.

    • yukichigai@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you’re going to have a shitty anticheat at least give people the option to play in anticheat disabled lobbies.

      This, a thousand times. I can understand requiring anti-cheat for Ranked matches, but some of us just wanna screw around. If there’s no progression tied to the match why should they care?

      (Microtransactions, if I had to guess)

      • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yup, at the very minimum let me continue to play TFT. You can’t really cheat there, and if you could, that’s more likely due to an underlying gamplay/UX problem.