• Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Actually, as a leading legislator in charge of creating our laws, it very much should be your job to decide this principle for future cases. I understand if you want to leave it to the next generation, though. You’ve done enough, Mitch.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    They needed to press him in a different way:

    "During the Trump impeachment, you said that he could still be held accountable in a court of law, his lawyers are trying to argue that only stands if he were impeached and convicted first.

    If the Supreme Court validates that opinion, would you change your mind and vote to convict?"

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That wouldn’t really matter. He’ll do and say whatever suits him politically at the moment.

      Like when he held up Garland’s Supreme Court nomination for a year and then jammed Barrett through while ballots were being collected.

    • Alteon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Seriously, if he thinks this makes him look any better for all the shit he put us through, he better fucking think again.

      He is a big reason as to why everything is so bad. He enabled all of this. This is his legacy.

  • runswithjedi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’d be more sympathetic to McConnell if he wasn’t a major reason for the current state of Congress and the takeover of the Republican party by right wing fascists.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Look, just because he lives in a shell, really likes lettuce, can’t get up if he is on his back, is clearly cold blooded, and looks like that… it doesn’t mean he is a turtle. /s

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Frankly if you don’t break with him on this you’re literally a traitor to this country. There’s no other way to interpret this.

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s worse than that. The ONLY reason the GOP is breaking on this is to preserve their ability to attack Democrat Presidents.

      There’s nothing “noble” going on here

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s important to note that the inverse isn’t necessarily true, and in fact McConnell is a counterexample: despite the fact that he did break with Trump on this, he’s still literally a traitor to this country anyway.

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    How many times did he factory reset before he got his full statement out in one go?

  • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “We’re going to find out, aren’t we? I mean, the Supreme Court is going to deal with that direct issue that I was referring to on February 13th of 2021, and I think we’ll find out sometime soon,” he replied.

    Does he think the current date is sometime before February 2021?

    • Bombhand@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      He’s referring to his own prior statement on Feb 13 2021. He’s losing his faculties but this particular item is not an example of that.

    • nelly_man@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      He’s referring to what he said when the Senate acquited Trump after he was impeached by the House.

      Trump’s lawyers are trying to argue that he can’t be prosecuted by the courts for actions he took as president unless he is first impeached and convicted in Congress for those actions. When Trump was impeached and acquitted in 2021, McConnell stated that Congress can’t impeach him as he is no longer in office and that the matter is an issue for the criminal justice system.

      As shit as McConnell is, he is not confused with his dates right now, and his statements from 2021 are very relevant to this case and have been discussed in the news a lot recently.

      I’m also not sure what’s wrong with your quoted text. Nothing about it sounds confused to me.

      US News (Feb 14, 2021): Text of McConnell’s Speech

      President Trump is still liable for everything he did while he was in office, as an ordinary citizen, unless the statute of limitations has run, still liable for everything he did while in office, didn’t get away with anything yet – yet.

      We have a criminal justice system in this country. We have civil litigation. And former presidents are not immune from being held accountable by either one.

      • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Thanks for the clarification and sources. It was just the way I read it from the article. Not suggesting he was confused in general about the content, just the current date

  • Baphomet_The_Blasphemer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well, I guess it’s nice to see this piece of shit sycophant at least has some limits… he still deserves to fall off a cliff into an portal of infinite dick, and get fucked.

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This isn’t about limits, this is about being able to go after Biden and any other Democrat Presidents in the future…

      This is PURELY self interest…

  • deft@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Whatever he says I don’t care. I hope he has the worst day ever everyday

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t understand what there is to discuss here at all. If the US president had immunity as a matter of principle, he wouldn’t be a president, he’d be some kind of god-king (even kings couldn’t do whatever they wanted).

      • DandomRude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well, I’m not very familiar with the US Constitution. But if there really is any leeway for such advances, it doesn’t seem to me to be a good constitution for a democratic country.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The conservatives agree… For conservative presidents only, of course.

        There ia no such thing as a “good conservative”. Each one is a cancer cell in the global disease that kills and oppresses normal people.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        From what I understand it’s just another way he’s making a mockery of the justice system. He’s making these absurd claims so he can have new cases come up and delay delay delay delay. Once he becomes president he can then have his DOJ dog wipe it all away.