• WhatIsThePointAnyway@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    This is part one of the religious rights plan to go after porn sites and their patrons. Don’t give them your ID. If they get power, it will come back on you.

    • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      I don’t think pornhub wants your ID.

      I live in Texas and just tested the site to see if anyone has changed. It hasn’t since they essentially shut down here.

      It’s a full page statement about Texas politicians.

      There’s no option to submit an ID even if a person wanted to do so.

      But maybe I’ve misunderstood who “them” is in your comment.

      • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        It’s not pornhub that wants your id, it’s the facist states, so they can have a registry of who’s not aligned with their puritanical ideals.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          To add to this, the repugs are going to demand user access data next and identity confirmation stuffs.

          They’ll see everyone’s porn habits. And have addresses for everyone watching anything except all the fucked up incest porn.

          • ansiz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            If they wanted to do that I’m sure they could get the data from ISPs already.

            Age verification bills are just virtue signaling for politicians.

            • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              16 days ago

              Im not sure ISP’s wouldn’t fight against turning that data over- and it would be hard to prove that it’s necessary for some kind of law enforcement access. (Unless they outright make porn illegal.) which would make it hard to acquire the necessary warrants (normally).

              Whereas, it would be a relatively simple enforcement claim to say they need to see all that data to ensure PH’s identification compliance.

            • skulblaka@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              16 days ago

              Not if you use a VPN. But now it wouldn’t matter even if you were using a VPN because if you want any porn you’ll need to submit a state-issued ID for “verification” purposes.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Republicans plotting in the open to install an authoritarian theocracy? Sounds serious!

      So when will democrats drop gun control considering this imminent threat?

      Armed queers bash back.

      SocialistRA.org

  • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    So, I have a pretty alright VPN provider, but I’ve been looking for a self-hosted solution to allow me to say “Hey, if you’re trying to hit www.domain.com, go through this VPN tunnel instead” but still run everything else straight through. Lots of options exist, I have one that would be perfect that we utilize at my company, but I haven’t found a good solution that doesn’t utilize enterprise level pricing.

    Anyone got any tips on that front?

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Tinyproxy

      https://github.com/tinyproxy/tinyproxy/releases

      Free Open source Upstream Http/s, socks4/5, direct redirection per site/URL/domain with regex. Can set default upstream proxy for everything else.

      Invisible proxy Reverse proxy

      Command line / simple text config

      It’s in your distros repo

      It’s available in termux.

      It works.

    • RazorsLedge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      You can use foxyproxy (browser extension) with SOCKS5 proxies to ssh tunnels to various hosts based on the URL pattern. Maybe too kludgey for your use case.

      • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Yeah, I’ve seen that one, but I’m looking for something not at the router level or something I can run on linux and just have everything run through. I have CLI-based options that are super janky… I’m probably just being too picky.

        • RazorsLedge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          I think it needs to be on the client app (web browser) before it gets sent thru the VPN. Your router won’t be able to read the http header to see what the URL is (to decide which VPN to use).

          • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            I know it’s doable in general because I’ve done it in an enterprise environment, just seems to be a real pain in the ass at the consumer level which is not surprising, it’s a weird use case.

            Where I work we have a system that kind of combines a proxy and a solution that approximates the same functionality as a VPN, and it’s all in one cohesive package. I know my first stop will have to be some sort of proxy, but my ideal is basically just a friendlier UI to manage it and for whatever proxy or proxy-like solution to include tunneling options out of the box.

            It’s a complicated ask, but I feel like it’s becoming more useful. Supposedly, Squid can do it with a few extra pieces and that might end up being the solution.

    • MehBlah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Get a cheap vps. Set up wire guard. Set up routes that pass through wire guard. In this case porn hubs IP’s go through the vps. Be aware that some vps providers IP blocks are often blocked by cloudflare and other similar services. So it pays to check out the IP rep of the vps provider before you choose.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Honestly, this feels like a canary in a coalmine. A coalmine that we’ve known to be on fire, but a canary nonetheless.

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    I had to travel to Austin for work a few weeks ago. Got off the plane, checked into the hotel, took a shower, decided to use mother nature’s melatonin to help with the jet lag… then, boom. Upload your driver’s license.

    So I had visited some sites that were hosted outside US and didn’t give a fuck about Texas’ stupid laws.

    These laws are not only authoritarian, they’re fucking useless.

      • Temple Square@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Yes. They want “small government” when the law affects them, but “law and order” when it punishes someone else who annoys them.

        It’s childishness we’ve come to be accustomed to, thanks to lead-brained 70-year-olds who are falling into legit cognitive decline… but still have the numbers to be a formidable opponent at the polls on election day.

        Also, their dicks don’t work anymore without a blue pill, so they may as well take away the consensual naked fun of Gen X, Millennial, and Gen Z (18+) people right?

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Republicans, which yeah. They like to talk about “small government” when it comes to billionaires and taxes, it really, that’s about it.

      • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Government so small it can fit in a uterus or male pee hole!

        (I know the scientific name but pee hole is funniest.)

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      In any given situation, sites beholden to these laws are much less likely to be hosting CSAM

      • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        If you get downvoted once, everyone else has to downvote you too before they read your comment, it’s the rule of lemmy.

        • Kairos@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          Why? Do you not remember how PornHub requires verification to upload content now? They’re also beholden to their payment processors.

      • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        That’s like saying a supermarket that’s burning to the ground is experiencing a record low theft.

      • Temple Square@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Other way around:

        Sites that COMPLY with laws and exit the state leave behind sites that do not comply.

        The sites you CAN reach in Texas are more likely to have trafficking victims and underage participants – because those sites clearly don’t give a hoot about laws.

        Texas drove away the wrong sites!

        • Kairos@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          Yes that’s literally what I said…

          Sites beholden to these laws…

          PornHub, sister sites, etc…

          …are much less likely to be hosting CSAM.

          Because of their moderation.

          Obviously it’s a big site and you can’t get rid of it all, but the percentage is absolutely lower.

    • Temple Square@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      What’s worse: Reputable sites that comply with U.S. laws (such as participants being 18+ and filming of their own free will) are effectively forced out, while questionable site carry on.

      The likelyhood of seeing abuse victims or underage in Texas goes up, not down.

      If they truly cared about protecting minors, they’d see the flaw in their law and rectify it. Of course, we all know (not through cynicism but cold repeated behavior) that political conservatives do not care about minors and care far more about punishing consenting adults.

      This law is a step toward the latter.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      It has a superior…… everything as well. I have NEVER got why people would use PornHub. Their website operates like a mobile website from 2009.

      Though, morally and ethically I think they stand out from the rest.

    • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      I just tested with my VPN and indeed xvideos doesn’t give a shit if you’re in Texas.

      The A record for xvideos resolves to the Netherlands so that’s probably why they don’t give a shit.

    • applebusch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      I know this is a joke, but that would require them to put actual effort into their shit ass slow ui that’s had the same stupid bugs for the past 15 years and still doesn’t have a search function that gives you what you fucking searched for.

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Conservatism / Religiosity is a plague that’s been retarding our species since the dawn of man.