• Butt Pirate@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Wtf do you want him to do? He loses the election in this hypothetical scenario. Do you want him to stage a coup? Refuse to leave office? How would that make him any better than dump?

    His best is literally all he can do. If you feel that isnt good enough, that’s a completely separate discussion.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      His best would be to promote a far more electable candidate and step down immediately. Continuing to stumble to the finish line and ultimately lose because of it is foolish.

    • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well we want him to step down now so someone else with a better chance of winning can run instead. I think this attitude of well if I lost and all the bad stuff happens it’s alright cause I tried my hardest is just infuriating cause it would be literally his fault for not stepping aside and he’s not even willing to accept blame for that.

  • Alex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why doesn’t he just go “a vote for me is a vote for Kamala” like a good octogenarian instead of trying to fool everyone into thinking he will last another 4 years…

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Why doesn’t he just go “a vote for me is a vote for Kamala”

      Because the US electorate is both racist and sexist. Reminding them that if Biden dies or is incapacitated that the country would be taken over by a non-white woman would probably drive votes to Trump. If his VP was a white protestant man, he could probably get away with reminding people how good his VP was.

      But, I do think you’re on to something in that his focus shouldn’t be on himself, it should be on his team. Tell voters that Trump is a narcissist, that his cabinet will be full of ass-kissers. Remind them of how many of Trump’s cabinet were yes-men and still got fired because they didn’t kiss his ass enough. Show how they did essentially nothing over 4 years despite control over the house and senate. Then, contrast that with the effectiveness of his people. For example, how Trump talked a big game, but accomplished nothing. But, Biden’s officials are actually suing the big tech companies for abusing their monopolies. A lot of the things Biden’s picks are doing are wildly popular among the American people, but most people aren’t aware of the accomplishments.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Can we not have an existential threat to democracy every four years? That would be neat. Here’s an idea, actually fucking punish people who already tried to overthrow the government, and have promised to do it again. It’s utterly crazy that he is in the running again instead of behind bars.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I know it’s difficult to understand for people coming of age in this era, but elections used to be pretty routine things, and the peaceful transition of power was a point of pride for our nation.

    • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Now you know how two thirds of Germans felt in 1933.

      Hitler should have been hanged for trying to overthrow the government, but instead got just a cozy few months in prison (where he wrote Mein Kampf).

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Also a reminder that the Germans who couldn’t be bothered to vote in that election didn’t get a chance to do so again for over a decade. And that was assuming they were even still alive after the holocaust and war.

        • el_bhm@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Just a reminder. Nazis did a trial run for Holocaust on political prisoners. In Germany.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s not how Hitler rose to power.
          This idea of blaming voters and not the system and the parties who pushed to do anything to punish the communists means you don’t get how this time around is already rhyming and you are blame the wrong people because it’s easier.

          • LeFantome@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            You don’t think Hitler was elected? Because that was their point. Regardless of the broader forces at work, how is it not the responsibility of the electorate to elect the right government?

            I do not believe he was attempting to blame anybody though. In my view, he is warning us ( well, Americans — I am not one ). He is saying that there is one chance to defend the future and, if you do not take it, you may be denied another opportunity.

              • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                That’s not quite true. The NSDAP did get the largest percentage of the vote, just not the absolute majority. So they needed other parties to form a coalition for a government. The conservative party and their figurehead Von Hindenburg made that move thinking they could control the Nazis this way.

                Hitler still won the election, democratically (although their thugs did intimidate a lot of people to vote for them).

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Also, how a lot of the Germans who did bother to vote got dragged into the madness despite it, because too many of their countrymen were idiots who could be misled by the obvious lies of a fascist.

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not an American and I would normally agree with your “every 4 years” thing. But given the Supreme Court decision on Presidential Immunity, you absolutely have an existential threat to democracy right now.

      Not only in the US either. This could topple the whole world order.

      I would welcome the old level of threat with open arms at this point.

    • Vilian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      oh no, that’s is something that a first world country would do, like brasil, be happy in your corporatocracy that’s how your system is designed anyway, there’s a very fucking good reason why any democratic country outlaw company donation to politican party

  • p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Jesus fuckimg Christ this is NOT what we need right now. Motherfucker you are a King now. It’s time to put your god damn immunity at work and fix this country.

  • A'random Guy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    This guy like most democrats is a waspy wet blanket. Couldn’t be more boring if he tried. On the other hand the right wing has perfected talking about nothing but looking good doing it. At least we took the HiGH rOaD

  • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    People need to chill the fuck out. We all know what we are getting with either candidate. This isnt the fuckin game of thrones where some forgotten character hidding in the old woods is guna wheel out and save the fucking day. If Biden loses to Trump the only people to blame are the ones who didn’t go out to vote. If Trump loses to Biden the only people to blame are the ones who didn’t go out and vote.

    I don’t give a fuck what the crackpots are guna say after the loss. There will prolly be protests, riots, panick but this will be the fucking end of the road the the shit show.

    No large mass is storming the capital again. No large protests will errupt into riots. The SCOTUS is set for the foreseeable future. Noone has the fuckiny overhead to cause a ruckus muchless miss work anymore. People are too fucking exausted paying out the dickhole just to afford the 300% pandemic price increases that are here to stay.

    Our parents left us for the summer with the grandparents and yeah maybe it was our first time seeing 70’s porn bush and stash, smoking a backwoods, and sipping on some moonshine that mightve just been kerosene, those of us who survived will guaranteed never be the same but we still grew older, wiser and hopefully developed a sense of fuckin regret for everything that brought us to this point. It’s a huge country with huge flaws but it doesn’t mean we can’t still be friendly neighbors who wave to each other 6 times a year.

    Well the mushrooms are kicking in so ima go and try to tell which fireflies are real and which ones are just reflecting off the pond water. No idea where I was going with this.

    • thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I like how this began to slowly make less and less sense.

      It reads a little like AI generated text. Be careful thinking too much about that if you’re on shrooms though!

      I’ve never taken shrooms, but I think the right phrase is… Have a good trip!

      • sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        One of the last remaining, not totally burned out hippies just told us to calm down, then yelled a bunch of boomer nonsense platitudes and gripes before admitting they’d taken mushrooms and were just screaming into the void.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If Biden loses to Trump the only people to blame are the ones who didn’t go out to vote. If Trump loses to Biden the only people to blame are the ones who didn’t go out and vote.

      Funny, I would’ve thought that the people voting for a candidate are the ones responsible for the candidate getting elected.

      • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Alice and Bob. Alice wins. She says that Bob can only blame himself for neglecting his training, but Bob blames Alice and says that if she wouldn’t have ran so fast, he could have won.

        Who is right and who is wrong?

        While it is true that Bob would have won if Alice was slow enough, it doesn’t mean that Alice should be carrying any blame here. She wanted to win the race. Bob is the one who did something wrong, because he did not want to lose and still didn’t do what he can in order to win.


        If candidate A gets elected, his voters don’t need to blame themselves for getting him elected. That’s what they wanted to do. Or, at least, that’s what the realistic option they preferred over the other realistic options.

        If he does something they don’t like, and it’s something that the other candidate wouldn’t have done, only then should they blame themselves for getting him into power. And even then - they should balance that against the bad things (in their opinion) candidate B would have done that candidate A wouldn’t.

        But for the very act of him getting their candidate elected? They should not feel guilty for that. They should feel pride - or at least, as much pride as casting a vote into a ballot can entitle.

        The ones who should feel blame are the ones who wanted candidate B elected and did not vote. They could have done something to contribute to the outcome they prefer - they could have voted. By their inaction, they have contributed to a result they did not want.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Alice and Bob. Alice wins. She says that Bob can only blame himself for neglecting his training, but Bob blames Alice and says that if she wouldn’t have ran so fast, he could have won.

          This analogy has literally nothing to do with anything. What’s happening is that Bob is saying that if he loses, it’s not because of himself or because of Alice, but rather because of Charlie, who isn’t even involved.

          But for the very act of him getting their candidate elected? They should not feel guilty for that. They should feel pride - or at least, as much pride as casting a vote into a ballot can entitle.

          Why should they feel guilt or pride? According to your insane “logic,” they bear zero responsibility for getting the candidate they voted for elected. The reason a candidate wins, apparently, has nothing whatsoever to do with the number of votes they receive, but rather, it’s entirely the people who don’t participate in the process who determine the outcome, somehow.

          • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Of course the number of votes matter. Not voting affects the number of votes, because if the non-voter would have vote - the number of votes would be different. The responsibility is shared between all the people who get the right to vote. No one argue that this includes the ones who actually voted - the argument is about whether this includes the non-voters.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              No one argue that this includes the ones who actually voted

              Is that a typo? Surely you mean that no one would argue that it doesn’t include the ones who actually voted.

              • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Right. Sorry. Was more along the lines of “no one argues with the fact that …”, which pretty much means the same thing as your correction.

                • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  The comment I originally responded to said:

                  If Biden loses to Trump the only people to blame are the ones who didn’t go out to vote. If Trump loses to Biden the only people to blame are the ones who didn’t go out and vote.

                  So we agree then that that position is ridiculous and that no one should be claiming that.

      • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Hahahah I see what ya did there. I would have lost it last night if I read this while listening to the stars shine.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      By that standard, as long as the Republicans push a shitty candidate, voters have no choice but to pick the Democrat. Gotta do better than that if you wanna sway people’s actions on election day.

  • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why is no one worried about the obvious decay of democracy under Biden and the DNC? 2020 was a very obvious act of anti-democracy when they messed with the prelims, no one got all bent out of shape. Just all piled on board. No one Saud a peep when they chose Harris was VP either, even though she was (is) terrible.

    I can’t take anyone seriously who is crying about losing our democracy. We haven’t had democracy recently. The DNC did everything they could to prop up people who would do their bidding, and ignored the voters until the voters had no choice but to fall in line.

  • tills13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    What a stupid question to ask. What’s Biden supposed to say “I will refuse to leave the office”?

    You mean like Trump? They’re fishing for a soundbite.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        OMG, Sam Seder, really? That dude is just a rage porn creator. And I dont really care what people claim or what way you guys are misleading. What is the exact method?

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            They cant do that without going to prison… They have already killed american citizens around the world, this is nothing new.

        • exanime@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Literally anything… Have his opponents assassinated, openly take bribes in exchange for killing regulations or selling pardons or us citizenship… Anything

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Sure, the president has been killing people and starting wars for decades and nothing happens. And how do you think all presidents are rich after being public “servants” for their whole lives? They will only get in trouble if its for personal gain directly.

    • nyctre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Don’t know the exact method, but I’m pretty sure appointing people that agree with him to the SCOTUS which will later rule that he’s got absolute immunity for official acts is one of the steps.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Do you see how the fact that you cant point to a path for these things to happen is the problem? The thing about immunity is just confirmation for what always has been, its not a new ruling. When they pretend like this is something new they are lying to you, its just now formalized.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Presidential immunity is not a new thing. It’s not just me saying that. A lot of people who are experts in the law are saying that, including the dissenting justices.

          The president can now do everything up to and including having their opponent assassinated by the military. There’s a good video about this here.

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Legal eagle is a biased person, he has bought into the propaganda just like all the rest of you guys.

        • nyctre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The fact that someone insufficiently familiar with law can’t point to a path for these things doesn’t mean that someone with more knowledge can’t. Also, how are you so sure it isn’t you who’s being lied to?

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Because I can look at what all the presidents in my lifetime have done and have zero consequences to. Trying to pretend that just now they cant get away with doing whatever they want is just silly. How many wars/conflicts have the presidents started on their own the few decades?

    • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s always gradual up until the very end. They chip away at your sense of normal by changing little things. It starts with censorship. They delete the ideas they don’t like. Then they eliminate free speech. Punish protesters. Increase militarization of police. Add a few laws about “appropriate behavior” you know, dress codes, curfews, male escorts, mandatory church attendance, et viola, authoritarian state.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        This is kind of funny/sad. Do you realize you just listed out the steps the left has taken in the last 10 years?

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Oh gotcha, I point out reality so it must be a troll. It would be good for you to actually learn what the fuck is happening and not just repeat the propaganda you read on the internet.

            • akakunai@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Buddy, you didn’t point out shit, you gave a presupposition. If you want to point something out, point out the legislation behind each of the “steps the left has taken in the last few years.”

              • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                I never said there was legislation, and in fact if they can accomplish steps without legislation then thats even better for them.

                Step 1 - Can you say mainstream ideas that conservative believe on social media and not get kicked off most platforms? No, you will get booted off most platforms.

                • akakunai@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  If we’re not talking legislation, then I don’t see how it’s all that important in a discussion about democracy. If a social media company chooses freely to decide they don’t want to platform someone, where’s the problem? That’s freedom, baby. I have very few carveouts where I will not support someone’s actual right to speech, but I do not think forcing any private entity to platform speech they are against is all that democratic.

                  I do not even agree that many of these companies are really all that quick to deplatform people either. There are many conservative voices on social media. The examples that come to mind where individuals were kicked off certain sites generally involve explicit undue vitriol against other people (individuals and communities), often wishing harm unto them. If this is not what you mean by the “mainstream ideas that conservative believe” that people are being kicked off platforms for (I sure hope not)…then what else? I mean, who is being booted off of platforms for saying they think the government is too big, or that they think x politician is doing a poor job, etc.?

                • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  Step 1 - Can you say mainstream ideas that conservative believe on social media and not get kicked off most platforms? No, you will get booted off most platforms.

                  Heh I know I’m starting a parallel reply chain, but I suddenly remembered this meme today. This is really the crux of the problem.

  • LeFantome@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I am not American so treat this comment with the low bystander value that it deserves.

    That said, I feel like Biden needs to do a lot more.

    Honestly, if I was him. I would be considering massively extreme options.

    Perhaps he should address the nation and say this:

    “I believe the Supreme Court has made a grievous error that threatens the Constitution, our Republic, and the freedom of the American people. They have bestowed the Presidency with powers that it should not have - powers that I as President should not have and do not want. Powers that will surely lead to our destruction.

    A President is not a king. According to the Supreme Court however, I am effectively your king at this time. Based on their new law, I can in this moment, if I choose, order the execution of not just Donald Trump but every Republican in Congress. According to the Supreme Court, I can never be charged or prosecuted for these acts. The next President could order the execution of me and my family. They could execute you and your family and there would be no accountability for doing so. The next President can ensure that we never have an open and fair election again. These are not exaggerations.

    It is clear that the Supreme Court intended these unprecedented legal protections to shield Donald Trump. However, as President, these powers now rest with me.

    As sworn defender of the Constitution, I have taken action tonight to right this wrong and to provide a small demonstration to the American people of just how destructive these new powers are and why we can never allow the Presidency to become above the law.

    As we speak, all nine Supreme Court Justices and their families have been detained and will be held without trial at an undisclosed location. Donald Trump and his family have also been detained.

    The issue of Presidential Immunity will be put before the Supreme Court when they meet again on November 4th. If they find that, in fact, President’s are not above the law and do not have absolute immunity from criminal prosecution, everyone will be released. Their future, and ours, is now in their hands.

    God Bless you all and God Bless America.”

    • Wilzax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Their future, and ours, is now in their hands.

      And ideally, just to be extra clear, he should continue with “Should they maintain their original position, that future will be in mine.”

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Of course not. We’re discussing a politician.

    It doesn’t matter what politician. It’s about them, money, and their ego.

  • UFO@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    10$ if Biden drops out some states will refuse to certify an alternate ballot. Resulting in a split vote and Trump winning the election.