The GOP is scrambling to find a line of attack against Kamala Harris’s VP pick — and it’s not going well

Tim Walz has made his debut as Kamala Harris’ running mate, and Republicans are struggling to apply their standard villainization playbook to the Minnesota governor.

Walz has been making waves for weeks now as a good-natured, relatable politician with a particular aptitude for dressing down the Republican agenda in terms that any voter can understand — and the GOP hates it.

Republicans are scrambling to paint the governor-turned-VP candidate as a devilish Marxist hellbent on running the country into the ground — their usual stuff — while leveling a bunch of other really weird attacks. Here are some of their most pathetic attempts to turn voters against Walz.

  • EvilBit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Believability is the nemesis of the GOP this cycle.

    Walz is a villain? Not believable

    Vance fucked a couch? Believable

    Trump took illegal funds from Egypt? So believable

  • ChadCMulligan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Dude is so likable and squeaky clean seeming that it makes me worry his crawlspace is full of human remains or something

    • chetradley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      “I hope Tim Walz sexually assaulted teenage boys so we can use it against him” would be such an eye opener if these people had the ability to think about what they were posting.

  • Otakulad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well yeah. I mean look at this man. Free breakfast AND lunch. Sounds like the devil’s work to me. You have to be a good Christian like Sarah Huckabee and remove child labor laws.

    I mean, who hugs kids like this anyway?

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I love the contrast this is painting between the far-left and far-right. On the one hand, you got fascists carrying tiki torches and chanting “jews will not replace us,” and on the other you got people saying “let’s make sure no children are starving.” And talking heads on Fox are super pissed about the latter.

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There is no far left in mainstream US politics. That is nothing more than republican fear mongering.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      To be clear neither Harris or Walz are “far left”…

      This is what actual moderates looked like.

      I’m happy to have them, but we lose if we call what they’re doing “far left”.

      We desperately need to bring the Overton Window back where it should be.

        • ceenote@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s what I’m saying. Right wing talking heads are priming people to start thinking “The far left doesn’t seem so bad.”

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Normal people know better.

          We’ll see. I suspect we’re going to get a full-court press against Walz, particularly after the DC media circuit was shilling so hard for Shapiro and didn’t get what they wanted.

          He’s going to get the same tarring and feathering as the Sanders campaign did, back in 2020, after Chris Matthews nearly had a heart attack on air when Bernie won Nevada.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        To be clear neither Harris or Walz are “far left”…

        Policies that were considered centrist compromise planks back in the 70s and 80s are now “Fringe Leftist Views” in the modern media, because so much of our information is owned and manufactured by right wing extremists.

        • teamevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Who love to scream that the liberal media isn’t right enough… the right is the absolute scum of the earth, they can shove their Fuck you I got mine attitude right up their ass

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        As far as I understand, far left is anti-capitalism (communism), and/or anti-authority (anarchism), and/or maybe more recently radical ecologists who are ready to destroy property.

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Some info about the stolen valor comments:

    Left national guard after two decades to run off public office

    Eustice says he remembers Walz struggling with the timing of wanting to serve as a lawmaker but also avoiding asking for a deferment so he could do so.

    "He had a window of time. He had to decide. And in his deciding, we were not on notice to be deployed. There were rumors. There were lots of rumors, and we didn’t know where we were going until it was later that, early summer, I believe,” Eustice told ABC News.

    Also, he did carry weapons of war and “in war”, unless someone wants to correct this.

    Walz deployed with the Minnesota National Guard to Italy on Aug. 3, 2003, to support Operation Enduring Freedom, according to the Minnesota Guard. The battalion supported security missions at various locations in Europe and Turkey, according to the Guard, and Walz was stationed in Vicenza, Italy, until returning to Minnesota in 2004. He did not deploy to Iraq or Afghanistan.

    On operation enduring freedom, part of war on terror

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Enduring_Freedom

    So, in fact he did carry weapons in war. Why are people saying he didn’t?

  • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I find that hard to believe. If they can’t find something true they’ll just make up something horrific and make him a villain out of that

  • akilou@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    How about spending some of that energy coming up with popular solutions to some of our country’s problems instead?

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You mean like protecting reproductive rights, eliminating non-competes, free breakfast and lunch in schools, free community college for low income, legalizing weed and giving people convicted of marijuana crimes to participate in the new industry, sick time requirements?

      That’s just part of what he’d done in the past two years.

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If Jesus were her running mate they’d find some way to double down on ‘Democrats bad’ by making a new hyper Christianity that’s even more theocratic and fascist.

  • So_zetta_slowpoke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Maybe don’t make your whole political strategy about tearing people down and try to actually run candidates who are better in some measurable way

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Also Republicans: screaming themselves hoarse about an Algerian woman boxer.

    The weird get weirder and I’m loving this VP pick.