• Asudox@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    LTT is the worst channel for privacy. I do like the channel for new tech and all but not for digital privacy.

  • Jalapeño Popper@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    I wonder how many of the people hating on Brave realize it was founded by one of the co-founders of Mozilla 🤔

    Brave is a great alternative to chrome, and it doesn’t require any extensions to reach its full potential.

    • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      I wonder how many of the people hating on Brave realize it was founded by one of the co-founders of Mozilla 🤔

      we do, we also realise that it was founded only because he got kicked out of Mozilla for being a bigoted piece of shit

      • Jalapeño Popper@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        That doesn’t stop Brave from being a superior product. Not that I’m defending the guy, I agree he’s a pos. But these browsers are both free as in beer and speech, so why would you kneecap yourself by using a sub-par engine? Brave ships ready to go out of the box. With Firefox, you have to add extensions just to get it up to Brave’s level.

        • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          so why would you kneecap yourself by using a sub-par engine?

          So I can be free from chromium !!!

          And the kneecap argument is really really really debatable.

        • foreverunsure@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          It’s true that you need extensions on FF to have some of Brave’s more advanced features. However, I consider this to be a good thing because you can skip their Web3/AI/Ads garbage and only get the features that matter like Forgetful Browsing (through Cookie AutoDelete) for a possibly lowered attack surface. Any Chromium fork, no matter how against big tech it claims to be, is still at the mercy of Google at the end of the day. Nobody is going to spend their time or resources patching Manifest V2 back into the browser after it’s completely gone from the upstream.

        • Senal@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          The subjectiveness of it being a superior product aside.

          Brave is chromium under the hood and therefore contributes to the rendering engine homogeneity that leaves Google in control of web standards.

          Iirc they are keeping some support for manifest v2 , for now. It’ll be interesting to see how that plays out for them both financially and from a technical upkeep point of view.

          I’d guess it doesn’t last long, but haven’t looked at it hard enough to have an informed opinion on it.

  • T (they/she)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    I am very confused. Wasn’t Linus the one that said that if you watch YouTube videos from creators using adblockers is like pirating their content? I didn’t watch the video because I can’t stand LTT but I am genuinely confused. Did he change his mind?

    • sunnie@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      his reasoning is that anyone who cares enough to use an adblocker already is, and if it’s impossible to prevent it it should at least be done properly

    • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      I think if was him he changes that a long time ago, they also have a video about pi-hole.

      Edit: Is him yes, he says that in the video around the 14 minute mark.

  • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    some choices mentioned are questionable (e.g. Brave and PIA), some good solutions are omitted (Organic Maps), but otherwise it’s… surpringly not horrible.

  • viking@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    As long as you are still sourcing the content from youtube, you’re not really de-googled.

    • Voyajer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      The video is available on floatplane as well if you want to watch not on YouTube/invidious

    • Handles@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Sure, but with the critical mass of videos on Youtube, and the sheer impossibility of consensually mirroring them all on another platform, accessing YT videos with Invidious or Newpipe is at least safer than wading unprotected onto Google’s platforms.

    • Pherenike@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Yeah it’s practically impossible to completely escape GAFAM unless we renounce ‘digital life’ or make a humongous effort or whatever. It’s about reducing / minimizing the amount of shit they know about us, not being the coolest most degoogled guy in the room. I can’t afford to quit my job just because they make me use Microsoft Authenticator. So yeah essentially it’s better to use Newpipe than Youtube, what a great thing that some dude or dudette decided to develop it for free, Peertube? Even better, yay options, end of story.