cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/5599990

A new browser with a “new engine” apparently (“that being chromium, gecko and webkit” according to one comment).

Your overall thoughts on it? The video is less than 20 minutes so far. Looks 'ight so far too, afaik. But I’m no expert.

  • jlsalvador@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    I tested it the last week from the main git branch, it doesn’t open YouTube homepage, yet.

      • jlsalvador@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird

        It takes a time to compile the whole project, but a way less than Firefox and Chrome. There is an AUR package for ArchLinux.

        IMHO, it is not yet daily-drive usable. Really slow for JS. The window manager is extreme limited (I can not drag tabs outside the window). It can not render steampowered neither youtube (I didn’t test any more websites, just these two). The current setting page is just a window popup with a checkbox for one option. But competition is always good for the users. A web browser is a big project for today standards. Good luck to these developers 💪👍

  • geography082@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    The main idea “ lest create a new browser because chromium and Firefox have bad reputation in privacy “ is fine, but looking deeper into the project feels more like a monetary opportunity than a real interesting project in this times of privacy fear (VPNs already did billions). And there are concerns with this one, related to the license. The whole things has much propaganda. More of pay for privacy shit. I really hope developers time are not wasted or used with a fake idea. Like happened so many times.