• Soup@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Having an account on X supports this shit whether you like it or not it.

  • Guilherme@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Local press and lots of people in Brazil criticize judges because, due to flaws on local laws and 80’s redemocratization efforts, they have some perks, privileges and exceptional powers no democratic country would give to them. There are cases ranging from content showing them traveling overseas being not visible on local internet and TV people being given cease-and-desist orders for disagreeing with some judge decision, to people being detained by Federal Police agents for criticizing justice system inside a plane that happens to have a judge among the passengers - not to mention those FBI agents detained at Rio de Janeiro airport for containing a judge’s wife who got unruly in a plane for drinking too much during the fly.

    This time however he asked for it, and our justice system toke the right decisions. Elon Musk should know how ridiculously overpowered our judges are before acting like that.

  • ovovo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Brazil didn’t shut down “X”. They did it themselves so X wouldn’t have a Brazilian entity subject to Brazilian court orders. That is why Starlink got caught in the mess.

  • Galds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    First of all, Elon is probably just trying to do some marketing bullshit But Brazilian STF is full of crap also, Alexandre de Moraes is Just censoring people without any judgment or justification, he tried to prohibit the use of vpn and created a “fake news” committee where he get to say what is real or not

    • pancakes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I tried searching for sources that back up the claim that the judge created a fake news committee under his control and couldn’t find anything.

      Not saying it’s false, but do you have a source for that?

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          The whole ordeal is still going in under some secrecy, but I suspect the main parts that make it controversial are these, from the given article:

          • When the inquiry began, it was from an “elastic” understanding of the internal regiment of the Supreme Court. It’s a process that, under normal circumstances, requires either a police or the Public Ministry to ask to investigate first.
          • In a lone vote against opening the inquiry, judge Marco Aurelio said the process should’ve begun via the Procuradoria Geral da República
          • Everything is still going under secrecy.
          • There’s no definite end in sight for the investigations

          The Brazilian STF has MANY flaws, chief among them of having no “power” that oversees it (the senate does, in theory, but no senator is dumb enough to fight the judiciary), but Moraes is the only son of a bitch with a sprinkle of decency (which I don’t expect to last past this “hunt” on the far right) and actually being proactive, unlike every other judge who is a morose sloth that will only react through “notas de repúdio” (notice of disapproval) that nobody gives a single flying fuck about and sit on fucking cases for over a year because there’s nobody to tell them to do their fucking job correctly*

          Very important to keep in mind is the context. During the entirety of bozonazi’s presidency (2019-2022), it was a known “secret” that he used everything he could to incite people against the supreme court. The Gabinete do Ódio (Hate Cabinet), which kept the crazies “informed” with bullshit, was a fact known by everyone. Among said crazies were the fuckers that, in june 2020, fired fireworks at the STF building as a “warning”. Bozo and his flunkies threatened the supreme court every fucking week and bozo himself used a meeting with foreign dignitaries to cast doubt on the voting machines. To think all those threats were empty would be pure stupidity, especially when they culminated with the January 8 failed coup.

          *Just look at Gilmar Mendes and his famous “perdido de vista” with ADI 4.650, where the old fart sat on the case for 18 months. It wanted to make it illegal for companies and corporations to finance political campaigns. The old fat fuck was in favor of keeping them legal but he knew if the judgement continued, his vote would lose, so he just sat on the case while the 2014 elections rolled with lots and lots of corporate money flowing around.

        • Galds@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          And I am not they, I do not speak for a group or Nothing of sorts, I just feel sad when my country situation is just overlooked, please don’t put me in the same basket as whatever you was putting me

  • Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    He acts literally like a fucking toddler.

    Perhaps even a toddler in a tantrum.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Now that’s just kind of rude toward toddlers. He acts like what he is… a Ketamine addled, narcissistic billionaire, who got lucky in life and thinks he crafted his own destiny all by his own hands.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Ketamine is a dissociative which strips away what you know about things, sort of like how a child doesnt know things. So in a way, he’s actually a toddler.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Fair enough, fair enough. Toddlers are way more pleasant than him, even when they’ve shat their pants. I apologise to all toddlers.

    • joenforcer@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      No they aren’t. They are changing how it works, in a way that is mostly immaterial to the user. That is not even close to completely removing.

      • somtwo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        No longer being able to hide your public posts from specific users seems hardly immaterial to me.

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yep.

        From the sounds of it:

        Before: if you block somebody, they cannot see your stuff.

        After: if you block somebody, they can still visit your profile.

        Usually, when you block someone, they can no longer see your feed; instead, it’s replaced with a message stating that they’re blocked. Now, they can freely browse your feed; they’re just not allowed to interact or comment on your posts.

        https://www.makeuseof.com/x-block-feature-poor-job-blocking-people/

        NGL Elon’s excitement sounds like he was blocked by a lot of people and Daddy Musk will not have closed doors in this household! 😮‍💨

        • Fiona@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          To be fair though: While circumventing that was as easy as logging out, the inability to see things while logged in was kinda stupid and gave people a false perception of privacy. In that setting that change is just a case of being honest.

          With the ability to view posts without account largely removed, it’s a bit of a different story, but I have to admit that if it’s public on Xitter, it’s still kinda public, so hiding it still kinda missing the poin.

        • Sanctus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Stalkers and abusers rejoice!

          Seriously, if you are on twitter and have had a relationship with someone like this do not post on your account or they will find you now.

      • freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        X/Twitter will soon be making more changes to the block button, with CEO Elon Musk confirming that all public posts will be viewable going forward, even to those who have been blocked

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          I thought most stuff was viewable even without account. Doesn’t seem like a big deal if you can view their post but not interact with it since I would’ve thought others interacting with you was what you wanted to block them from doing anyway.

          • SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            If you’re blocking users left and right that you know spread misinformation, you will still see their posts. No way you can keep track of the usernames in your head, and now you may hear a misinformation or two and assume it to be a fact.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Isn’t that how it works on most platforms though? You can see the account you’ve been blocked by, but can’t interact with them.

          • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            On reddit it stopped the blocked person from seeing your account and comments.
            Or it used to. Or I’m misremembering.

        • joenforcer@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Which is not even a big deal because blocked users could just create a separate account to view posts they’re blocked from anyway.

  • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    It beggars belief, how one who grew up in the abject lap of luxury, surrounded by prolific and successful businesspeople that negotiate billion dollar deals for a living, how that child grew up to be one of the most illiterate fools on Earth when it comes to economics and business administration. It just further reinforces my belief that the $22B he took from MBS for the purchase of Twitter was part of a larger plot to destroy its reputation and make it unusable for any would be revolutionary group to use to organize. Like, assume for a second that he ran his mouth and then was forced to buy Twitter (as the popular narrative goes). Why would MBS be cool with giving Elon $22 BILLION for his fuckup?

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Why would MBS be cool with giving Elon $22 BILLION for his fuckup?

      Same reason idiots kept throwing money at trump back when his resume was just a list of bankrupcies (several hotels, an airline and a casino), moneyed people are way stupider than we think.

    • uranibaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Perhaps Elon ran his mouth, was forced to buy Twitter because signed papers and MBS saw an oppertunity to remove Twitter from the scene?