This is probably the right legal process as much as it sucks. If this wasn’t the rule, all needs for warrants would be unnecessary.

You think Putin would do us a solid?

Maybe someone could loosen a carpet near the stairs

They both stay alive through the end of it

I don’t even say this to be insulting, but if she weren’t famous, these bans would absolutely be impacting her personally.

If I saw Marge walk out of a woman’s restroom, and I was small minded enough to give a shit, she would not pass.

“But also, they can’t move here.”

Future generations hate you

This is a fundamental belief of most conservatives I know. “If I don’t do it, everyone else will and I’ll be the loser who didn’t.”

Which is how anarchism has played out so far lol

Those same people get real salty about “tankies” who they think= anyone left of Biden and not a pacifist.

It’s really not unless you think Kurt would have been terminally online.

They vote for their team no matter what, while Dems decide if they vote at all or not. The idea of a swing voter as a major force hasn’t been reality in multiple elections.

If this helps down ballot Dems, maybe it’s a savvy move, but it really looks like it is another “demotivate my base to appease people who will literally never vote for me” move.

Anyone with experience in corporate operations will tell you the ROI on process changes is dramatically higher than technology. People invent so many stupid and dangerous ways to “improve” their work area. The worst part is that it just takes a little orchestration to understand their needs and use that creativity to everyone’s benefit.

Yeah, I can’t do Instagram or TikTok because within 3 videos I’m either getting something inflammatory or selling something. An algorithmically neutral version would be amazing.

Invasive plants expand and kill the native species. Bradford Pears like those planted by my prior home owner prevented anything else from growing under it and 2 years after removal, is still trying to sprout.

It literally already passed that point. The headline details the elements of a crime.

You absolutely can reference character. It just isn’t itself evidence of other crimes.

The fact that Alito lives in a suburb near some random out of work actress and the worst his wife has experienced is unpleasant signs shows we are the most peaceful human beings as citizens regarding their politicians.

Lmao the terms of the probation should dare him not to lie

It’s not case by case, but crime by crime. It should be decided on a basis of rule of law as to which specific crimes, such as those reflecting character and not just a lapse in judgement.

Trump has many convictions reflecting on his character in this one trial.