https://youtu.be/qqXi8WmQ_WM?si=ReO8icPKMlsBiebA

I’ve got the digital version of scythe but haven’t gotten around to trying it.

It’s still not good, imho. It’s supposed to be a game about exploring space. But the “exploring” in this case is just fast travel. I grew up on Bethesda games, I hold games like Morrowind, Oblivon, and Fallout 3 in very high regard. Starfield just got so boring, so fast, I couldn’t continue playing after only like ten hours, if that.

No bother at all! They are all different dragons with wonderful original art, but the cards don’t have trivia. There is a “dragons facts sheet” thing that’s included just as flavour.

Might not be the best person to answer the latter, as my partner and I played an absolute crap ton of Wingspan just the two of us and thought it played fine enough, even without the Asia expansion.

It heavily features a race of creatures that have posed as gods throughout most of human history, so it touches on almost all the mythologies. Egyptian mythology features very heavily, with Ra being the first of this alien race that the series engages with.

I like Wyrmspan because it shakes up the mechanics, but to be perfectly honest I just love dragons more than birds so the art alone practically sold me on it lol

Nah my mind went to Stargate

Call to Adventure, Wingspan/Wyrmspan, most of the Tiny Epic series, Coup are all solid contenders.

I like the Red Raven games but I don’t really look forward to playing them because of all the set up and tear down lol, I would love them as digital products with automation.

My campaigns tend to last 2-3 years.

When you’re a forever GM and have been running the same system for a decade, you start to care about the system.

It took you several minutes to read this comic?

What advantages would this have over Obsidian, which is already all local unless you explicitly make it not so?

It’s particularly annoying because these online forms defeat the entire purpose of a résumé.

You’re still misrepresenting their stance. They don’t believe there’s a “gun problem”. That doesn’t mean they want children to die.

No, it’s not the same as saying they don’t want it fixed. I think that he is woefully wrong, even negligently wrong. But I don’t need to misconstrue his stance or argument to think that.

Burchett said that “we”, as is the legislative branch, are not going to fix it. He didn’t say he didn’t want it fixed.

Now, I disagree with him as I suspect you do too. But that’s no excuse to warp someone’s argument into something it’s not.

Fat chance. Line must go up.

Ew, don’t associate those two ever again please.

Never hurts to have more and more evidence for something.

Unraid has been so simple for me. Really pleased with it.