The move would extend her 36-year House career and continue to freeze her would-be California successors in a long-standing holding pattern.

          • transmatrix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Socialism has a definition, not sure why I’d need to provide one. In general, I feel the government should serve the interests of the people. I support things like welfare for all, basic income, guaranteed housing, etc.

            • PorkRoll@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I ask because you seem to have a very different definition of what socialism is from me because everything you’re describing is just social welfare. For example, I an Anarchist (syndicalist, if you want to get technical), could be considered a ‘socialist’ as my ideology would have governance under a federation of industrial unions. No president, no electroeal college, no leaderism. I ask again, what do you consider “socialism” to be?

              • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                That sounds like it would end up being a plutocracy within the first generation. Unions are great for workers, but they aren’t a magical solution for government.

                • PorkRoll@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Industrial Unions aren’t the same as trade unions. I’d recommend looking into the IWW as (pretty much the only) example of this.

        • PorkRoll@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess it is a bit of a loaded question, but it was done with the intent of just finding out what they define their ideology as.

          • BigNote@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s precisely my point. It’s a question that was asked in the furtherance of a specific and very obvious regime of intent. In that sense it was the epitome of intellectual dishonesty.