• OrgunDonor@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because it is a subscription service. It is not actually a product you buy outright. It is still bullshit, and should probably be illegal to change to charging for installs though.

      • darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        OK, let’s say it is a subscription model, which I’m sure it is. Wouldn’t I have to agree to the new terms for them to charge me? How can they charge me for previous installs that I never agreed to pay them for?

        This seems to me like Unity is opening themselves up to a lot of litigation for loss of income from lost sales of software thanks to the updated licensing terms.

        • OrgunDonor@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can cancel, and stop selling the game, which is what Cult of the Lamb is threatening to do(and others should do if this actually goes ahead). But if you continue to use and sell your game, you have to agree to the new terms and conditions.

          • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s srill odd tho. It’s like netflix saying: i know you paid monthly for years, but we retroactively need you to pay a dollar for every movie and 50 cents for every tv show you watched.

            • dom@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Are they not charging for new downloads starting in January? What I understood was by “retroactive” they meant it applies to all games, even those previously released