• Syldon@feddit.ukOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    As was stated by many at the time. The banks cannot state it openly because of litigation, but that does not mean they cannot recognise the potential cost it presents.

    • teamonkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The costs are high. Finance regulations force the banks to investigate high-profile clients for any conflicts of interest or reasons where a bank may be facilitating something illegal or sanctioned. It is literally illegal for the bank not to perform these checks. They can’t just put on blinkers and claim ignorance.

      It would be at least negligent to shareholders, and possibly outright illegal, not to act on that information if there were significant risk.