• Compadre de Ogum@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        that is confusing. that sense can very well be communist. would i be wrong to presume you dont really know what are either of them?

        • GrandmasterFrank@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well “anarchist” can mean a lot of different things depending on the person so I find it more useful to just say what I agree or disagree with.

          • Compadre de Ogum@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            bro, you are commenting in a community called “moretankie196”, of a marxist-leninist instance whose name is inspired in a soviet city. we do care about concepts and definitions.

            you are very welcome to learn, with us, though :D

              • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Except that’s not what anarchism is, and you can’t just say “Anarchism is whatever my heart says it is”, by saying that it has a lot of different definitions to people. That’s not how definitions works, especially for a political ideology.

                • GrandmasterFrank@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  you can’t just say “Anarchism is whatever my heart says it is”,

                  That’s unnecessarily aggressive, and not what I said at all.

                  That’s not how definitions works, especially for a political ideology.

                  Were it so easy.

                  • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Ad hominem deflection via tone policing is one of the weakest counter arguments there are. You can really do better, at least try to engage the main point next time, though that’s a bit difficult with no actual argument besides, “The definition is whatever I want it to be”.

                    If that’s not what you said, then what does this mean?

                    “Well “anarchist” can mean a lot of different things depending on the person“

                    And yes, it is that easy. That’s the entire point of political theory. Whether it be Marxist-Leninist, Liberal, Neo-liberal, fascist, and yes, anarchist, they all have established definitions.

          • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Exactly, some “anarchists” are just liberals who like to have an edgy/faux-radical flag and symbol (you), while others are communists with ideological differences who are still willing to work with us toward a similar goal.

            • GrandmasterFrank@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              are just liberals who like to have an edgy/faux-radical flag and symbol (you),

              cool ad hominem but I never claimed to be an anarchist

              • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sorry, but I got the impression you were, as you repeatedly said you agreed with parts of anarchism and think anarchism can mean many things. If you consider being called “liberal” an ad hominem then what are you?

      • Valbrandur@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In that case you’re holding a belief that goes completely against the ideas implied by the label you use. Yes, there’s always variety of thought in all political fields but this one is an outright contradiction.

        Also, nice Trevor Moore pic.