• Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nobody. During Winter War Finland was fighting alone against Soviet Union.

        I think that’s one of the things that made the war so notable, tiny Finland fighting against huge Soviet Union, 1 v 1.

        It wasn’t the symbol of Finnish military till 2002. It was in some limited use. I think it still is btw. The reason was that it’s old Finnish symbol since I think iron ages or before and for example the air force logo came from a Swedish count in 1918. Pretty interesting history.

        • axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Holy hell this is wrong. Finland in the winter war was a fascist state allied with Germany and it had been since the communists lost the civil war in 1918. Communists had been rounded up and put in camps by the tens of thousands. Finland was effectively a German puppet state by the time the Soviets invaded in 1939.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Finland in the winter war was a fascist state allied with Germany

            No, you are thinking of Continuation War. During Winter War Finland wasn’t allied with Germany, rather contrary to that Germany was hampering some efforts to ship armaments to Finland because of Molotov-Ribbentrop. Not only that, Finland wasn’t at all fascist. It was a functioning multi-party democracy.

            Finland was effectively a German puppet state by the time the Soviets invaded in 1939.

            That has no basis in reality. I suggest you read this article that gives some basics about the background for Winter War https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Background_of_the_Winter_War

            See for example: "Finnish–German relations cooled after the National Socialist Party rose to power in Germany in 1933. Finns admired Imperial Germany, but not the radical and antidemocratic Nazi regime. Finnish conservatives did not accept the Nazis’ state violence and antireligious policies. Still, there was sympathy for German aims to revise the Treaty of Versailles, but the official Finnish policy was reserved, especially after the German invasion of Czechoslovakia. Finland even recalled its ambassador for a short period.

            Finnish Nazis and ultranationalist parties such as the Patriotic People’s Movement achieved only minor support in several elections, especially in the aftermath of the failed Mäntsälä rebellion in 1932."

        • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why did Finland Siege Leningrad from the north and seize the northern isthmus?

          Why did Finland attempt to cut off Murmansk on the German’s orders?

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not Winter War, that’s Continuation War. Simo Häyhä didn’t fight in Continuation War. As for war aims during Continuation War, the answer is obvious, to defeat USSR. It’s like asking why Germany bombed the UK.

            • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              1 year ago

              He wanted to fight in the Continuation War, he was barred entry to the army.

              Also the Continuation War began in 1944. Those things I mentioned happened in 1941, during Operation Barbarossa. Finland was an ally of Nazi Germany.

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                He wanted to fight in the Continuation War, he was barred entry to the army.

                Yes

                Also the Continuation War began in 1944.

                No, Continuation War happened 1941-44. You’re thinking of Lapland War now. That’s 1944-45.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In this case the communist attacked you and started shooting you first. I’d imagine most would defend themselves when attacked

        It’s an interesting idea though that anyone who communists attack are Nazis. Maybe the funniest conclusion from that is that Vietnamese were Nazis since China attacked Vietnam in 1979.

        • TheGamingLuddite [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Finnish state that fought the Soviet Union, the one which was allied with Nazi Germany, was only established after the wholesale massacre of communists and workers. Anticommunism is the modus operandi of fascism in all its forms. The axis powers in WWII were formalized in the “Anti-Comintern Pact” to which Finland was a signatory.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Using something happened in 1918 and especially 1941 to justify calling Finland Nazi during Winter War that happened in 1939-40 seems fairly creative.

            Interesting thing about the Civil War and Winter War though. After the Civil War Finland was heavily divided nation for a long time. And while the wounds had started to heal some, it was the opposition to the Soviet attack that actually brought the left and right together. I’m not sure how true it is, but I’ve heard Stalin expected the Finnish workers to celebrate him coming over and “freeing them” and was quite surprised that they were having none of that.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It would feel a bit strange to say Finland was Nazi during Winter War because during Continuation War Finland was Axis aligned when the USSR attack in Winter War is the biggest reason Finland sought closer ties with Germany.

            • diegeticscream[all]🔻@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              22
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So:

              • The Soviet Union feared that the noted anti-communists in control of Finland would allow it to be used as an operating base for the Nazis.

              • The USSR attempted diplomatic resolution to those fears with Finland.

              • They were denied.

              • The USSR invades Finland to secure safety from that fear.

              • They win.

              • The noted anti-communists in control of Finland then allow it to be used by the Nazis as a base for the Nazis, and support them in attacking the USSR.

              You’re saying the Continuation War happened solely because of the Winter War, and that the noted anti-communists were in no-way ideologically aligned with the Nazis before the USSR’s attack?

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                The USSR wanted Finland to give it areas including the main Finnish defensive line. Knowing what happened with Czechoslovakia and “just a few areas” and knowing what happened to Baltics, it’s easy to see what road that would’ve taken Finland down on.

                You’re saying the Continuation War happened solely because of the Winter War

                No, I’m saying Finland sought help from the Nazis because during Winter War Finland was left completely alone, the preferred alliance direction of Nordics or UK/France/US panning out to not have done much at all. And both sides, USSR and Finland knew it was just a temporarily truce and another war was coming. Obviously Finland didn’t want to be alone, again.

                the noted anti-communists were in no-way ideologically aligned with the Nazis before the USSR’s attack

                Mostly the Finnish leadership were noted anglophiles.

                  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    For sure. But both sides saw another war coming and with how close Finland was to being fully occupied, the worry was that this time Soviet Union wouldn’t stop until they had achieved that. Understandable worry in my opinion, even though fighting alongside Nazis is a black mark on Finnish history.

                • Vertraumir@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  wanted Finland to give it areas

                  And offered more area in Karelia in return, it wasn’t some kind of a one-sided deal

                  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Area cutting through the Finnish main defensive line and an important peninsula and harbor close to Helsinki vs. areas in the middle of nowhere in Karelia. It wasn’t a one-sided suggestion, in fact by area I think the offer was bigger, but it’s easy to see why it wasn’t accepted when you consider what would be given and where.