• freagle@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      65M is what percentage of 1.4Bn? It’s about 5%.

      5% oversupply is pretty reasonable, especially given that the housing isn’t fungible and the populations are more mobile than the houses are.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      That doesn’t actually mean there are 65 million surplus properties. A vacant house isn’t an unnecessary house. Children move out all the time, families sometimes break up, Chinese citizens currently living overseas or in Europe return home, etc.

      I bet there’s actually math for this - I wonder if anyone has calculated the optimal amount of vacancies?

        • zephyreks@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sometimes, you misspeculate. Some developers lost a whole fuck ton of money on the project, but that’s more than made up for if you can turn a profit on projects near big cities (which demand is still sky high for).

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          I still find it hard to believe that they are making the best use of labor and materials

          Is anyone? If I have to choose between “housing shortage” and “housing surplus” I know which society I would prefer.