• mateomaui@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well it’s a good thing that reality doesn’t revolve around your opinion.

      edit: I mean, let’s see here, how many credible people can I think of on Lemmy?

      Not a single one, because we’re all anonymous random people. The only shred of credibility here is sharing something a fairly well validated website or news source… exactly like on Twitter. You act like no one on here posts questionable things that get removed. That is selective delusion for you.

      • AssPennies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        how many credible people can I think of on Lemmy?

        Nobody’s arguing there are credible people here on lemmy, that’s a strawman you’ve set up.

        • mateomaui@reddthat.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          False. The implication is that information shared by people not on Twitter, such as here, is more credible than information shared by someone on Twitter.

          Try harder, you idiots are boring.

          edit:

          Also, the stupidity of the assertion that no one on Twitter has credibility is enhanced by the raw fact that possibly every single person who writes the articles that are shared here on Lemmy from sources deemed trustworthy by some percentage of you also happen to have Twitter accounts. At some point, it becomes an inherently ignorant argument.

            • mateomaui@reddthat.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Hey, fucktard, you can always block me if you can’t handle it. I block annoying people on here too, it’s really no big deal.

              Apparently you cannot read, because I’ve expressly said under this post that it’s a dumpster fire, so obviously I don’t “like it so much”, dumbass.

              What I’m arguing against, if you’re capable of removing your head from your colon long enough to comprehend something, is the clear assertion made here

              that anyone who has a presence on Twitter has no credibility. TruthSocial? Sure I’ll agree with that, but it’s ignorant and dismissive of all the upstanding people who were on Twitter before Elon took over, and who actually have a loyal following or are part of communities that they chose not to ditch to go somewhere else.

              I’m pretty sure for all us random nobodies, including you, it was no big deal to switch, but that’s not actually a valid reason to malign everyone still on twitter as having zero credibility.

              Fuck off if you don’t like it. You don’t have to endure my presence, asswipe. The block button is right there for you to use, just like on Twitter.

              • AssPennies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                You said, multiple times in different terms:

                The implication is that information shared by people not on Twitter, such as here, is more credible than information shared by someone on Twitter.

                No one made that implication except you, fucknuts! Just like I’ve said mulitple times: you’re the one making up these “implications” in your head, you’re the one crafting these strawmen, and then you’re the one that’s all bent out of shape!

                • mateomaui@reddthat.comOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  If you’re too dumb to understand even with a provided screenshot, then you’re too dumb to be part of the conversation.

                  I’m sorry your comprehension level is this poor.

                  edit: what’s funny is that you’re coming back almost 24 hours later to continue arguing about it, and I’m the one bent out of shape about something? LOL

                  • AssPennies@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Look at your original argument:

                    Not a single one, because we’re all anonymous random people. The only shred of credibility here is sharing something a fairly well validated website or news source… exactly like on Twitter. You act like no one on here posts questionable things that get removed. That is selective delusion for you.

                    Now look at your fucking screenshot, I’ll wait. Do you see where Junkers_Klunker claimed anything about lemmy, at all? You know why you don’t see them making suck a claim? Because it isn’t fucking there, fuckwad!

                    You’re the one that made the claim that lemmy is to be held in higher esteem, nobody else! That’s textbook strawman! Someone said chirping on xitter makes you less credible, and you pulled out the “and lemmy’s better in that regard” totally out of your ass! It’s right there in the pic you posted, nothing about lemmy in it!

                    what’s funny is that you’re coming back almost 24 hours later to continue arguing about it

                    And it’s even funnier that you’re replying back! (Btw, this is the first downtime I’ve had to read shitposts since yesterday, at the same time as yesterday, almost like that’s when I’m finally off of work or something; don’t go taking any detective jobs there, Columbo.)