• kiku123@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess that since Epic owns Unreal Engine that bad news for Epic means good news for Godot?

      I don’t think that Epic is going to want to divest from Unreal considering how much money it makes.

      I also don’t think that it’s a zero-sum game. As a developer I want Unreal (and Unity) to be great so it creates more competition. Unreal has led the way in a lot of cool gaming tech that Godot is picking up.

      • Rose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Epic actually invested in Godot with their MegaGrant. Godot is also available on the Epic store.

        • mammut@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe it was reverse psychology. Epic is trying to destroy the competition by giving them money. Then, paranoid gamers will refuse to use or support Godot, because there’s a connection to Epic.

        • Ranjeliq@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Epic also gave money to Lutris, while Epic’s CEO was smearing Linux users on twitter, so I wouldn’t count on Epic’s stance on things and where some of Epic’s money going aligning any time soon. Those megagrants feel very disingenuous to me (doesn’t mean that those money do not help those “underdog” projects, though).

      • Weslee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s an open source game engine that has received alot exposure since the whole Unity fiasco

      • crius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Godot is an open source game engine that is incredibly trending among the “hipster” developers community and fanatics of FOSS.

        It’s absolutely not even close to the features offered by Unreal Engine or Unity but people that are barely informed are all excited because now an open source project with some serious bugs and limitations “will show them”.

        Unless there is a serious rewrite, Godot will never be a valid alternative to the two main commercial engines. And with the fact that it had been recently heavily rewritten to be updated to v4, it is really improbable that it will happen soon.

        • Pxtl@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unless there is a serious rewrite, Godot will never be a valid alternative to the two main commercial engines

          How so? I’ve seen complaints about the C# API and some similar challenges, but nothing show-stopping. Obviously you won’t be making a AAA game in it, but for indies it looks like a decent option.

          The dirty secret of software is that any given user-facing OSS application is about 15 years behind the closed-source competitors, but the fact is that most software was good-enough 15 years ago and the industry has spent the last 15 years on cloudifying and A-B testing and GUI revamping and other stuff that isn’t basic functionality.

          • crius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The thing is, even Indies can look and feel like AAA games (well, the good ones) with something unreal engine for example.

            I’m not a fan of Epic by any means but all I’m saying is that they asinine aren’t in the same league while with Unity they could at least be close.

            Unity have done a real shitty moves but all this “We’ll do even better without it” attitude that I’m seeing around is either coming from people that just think “shitty move” or really really really naive developers.