• BudgieMania@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    I really really hope that the expectation vs reality of Starfield is the final straw that makes people pause the next time a game markets itself as having an scope and quality that is absurdly beyond anything else on the market.

    We have seen this story time and time again and the claims never, ever, materialize on launch. Maybe they get closer to the initial scope over the next few years if they can afford continued development and support, but that’s exactly the point, that you need way more man hours and budget than what is acceptable in a realistic development cycle to reach that kind of scope while maintaining overall quality of the game.

    The next time that a game claims to have absurd size or whatever million planets or that you can be anything you want or whatever other immense thing like that, ask yourself what parts of the game have taken a significant backseat to achieve that. Because we are well past the point of the industry having proven that the limitations for the scope of a game are not technical anymore, but budgetary. And there’s only so much that can be done in 8 years.

    • Blamemeta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      Its more than that. Its bland. Fucking Skyrim had more going for it than neon. Tavern wenches shows more skin than Neon Workers. People actually bleed in skyrim. Drugs even, I think skooma has better writing tham Aurora.

      SF is just corporate.

      • Eochaid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        Tavern wenches shows more skin than Neon Workers.

        The fuck?

        People actually bleed in skyrim. Drugs even, I think skooma has better writing tham Aurora.

        Uh huh…

        SF is just corporate.

        Or…maybe just going for a different tone that doesn’t fit your dark gritty sensibilities?

        • Blamemeta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Maybe, but it feels more corporate and sterile than just a different tone. Like they wanted more but had to reign it in.

          • Eochaid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            There’s literally no evidence they ever considered another tone. They were clearly going for a Star Trek tone, not a space opera.

            • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Considering all their past recent games had those aspects at least somewhat… It’s odd that they sterilized it so much in comparison.

              Compare that to BG3 where there’s like… Full on sex and people can explode into a bloody mess

    • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Honestly, seeing this AAA game play like a shit-tier shovelware game on my pretty fucking robust Linux gaming PC makes me kinda fine with Star Citizen taking its sweet time now.

      • drekly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        LOL star citizen is taking its time to vacuum up money, not develop a good game. They haven’t even decided on a flight model. In a flight game. After a decade.