• julianwgs@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Thanks for your comment. Not wrong in the sense that the data is wrong or faked, but that the metric is not useful. Especially when better metrics are readily available for that region. Can you name me one prediction or result which you can infer from the frequency of train travel other than „fun facts“? (I am actually really curious :) ). With the modal split you can for example calculate CO2 emissions or estimate needed capacity increases if you want to replace one mode with another and much more.

    • kraxelkatze@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think the number of trips says a lot about the role trains play in people’s everyday lives, maybe even more than the kilometers travelled. Sure, that’s not a “metric”, but it does give us an idea if people use trains just for vacation a few times a year, or for their commute to work or other daily trips. For someone taking a train just once a year, even if that is for hundeds of kilometers, we know that they will use a different means of transportation for most trips.

    • cestvrai@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I really like when I can just show up at the station and jump of a train without the need to consult a timetable beforehand. Not sure what you can infer, but I value frequency!

      • Spzi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes, absolutely a game changer. Maybe comparable to having your car parked in front of your house vs the need to rent a car for each trip.