• Nepenthe@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So they’re not allowed to have the money…and they’re also not allowed to donate it? Am I clear? Because that seems stupid, tbh.

    The world worked a little better when philanthropy was encouraged for the tax break. It always will. They get their cute little name on a plaque, whatever. The money goes where it’s needed.

    This is not to say anyone needs to be able to make that much in the first place, but demonizing one for also getting rid of it is funny

    • Poob@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The money goes where they want it to go, which is frequently not where it’s needed.

      And you are correct, they should not have the money, since they didn’t earn it. They also shouldn’t get to decide where it goes, since they aren’t suited to make those decisions. It should be taken from them.

      • gullible@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Behold, I am a pedant that agrees with you! However, I do believe that billionaires earned their money… in the same way that a plantation owner earned their terrifying hoard; using their complete moral depravity and means.

        • Poob@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          See you call that earning. I call it stealing. When something is earned, it would be wrong to take it from them.