• SpicySquid@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well… I guess I have been living under a rock. Today is the first time to have heard of info. I have been using man for well over 2 decades now.

    • palordrolap@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Surprising you haven’t come across a man page that basically says “We couldn’t be bothered putting everything in here, check out the info page on it instead.”

      I feel like I find myself on one of those every 6 months or so.

      • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s funny, I had the opposite experience. When I found out that info was the GNU projects recommended way of documentation, I was all on board. Then I tried using it, and it couldn’t find most CLI software I used. So I downloaded the texinfo archives… and that still lacked probably 50% of the commands I tried to look up.

        Then I searched up how to get info pages for this or that tool, and someone on StackOverflow had said that it was woefully incomplete and outdated at this point.

        I think I’ll give it another try and report back

  • jsdz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The “info” thing was a misguided attempt by a crazed bunch of emacs zealots to usurp the rightful position of “man”. Probably GNU’s worst idea. It persisted in having some popularity for a decade or more but is now mostly forgotten I think. Despite having used Debian for the past ten years straight I’ve only just now found out that info doesn’t even get installed by default any more.

    • iusearchbtw@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh, to be honest, manpages aren’t particularly good as either documentation or quick references (hence the popularity of tldr), and info is intended primarily for the sort of long-form, comprehensive documentation that would be awkward to fit in a manpage. Also, texinfo documents can easily be exported to HTML, so one format can be used for both online and offline docs. It’s an admirable effort, if nothing else.

      • jsdz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’d have liked it a lot better if it had been intended and used as a place to put the more extensive documentation that isn’t really appropriate for a man page, while leaving the man pages as they were. Instead, I learned about it back in the day by being frequently annoyed at missing man pages for basic tools, which had been replaced with suggestions to look at ‘info’ instead, which always seemed to be much less concise and have a worse UI.

      • kugiyasan@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wasn’t a huge fan of manpages either until I got a kernel class at uni. The man pages for syscalls and library calls are super well made.

    • TurboTurbo@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can you provide any source that it was created or initiated by what you call ‘a crazed bunch of emacs zealots’, or that the goal was to ‘unsurp the rightful position of “man”’. Quite bold statements that are unlikely to be true imho.

    • Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just because it’s theirs? I figured it would be because of an alleged gender issue, for the same reason some are trying to do away with whitelists/blacklists and the like.

      • jsdz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, nothing to do with that sort of thing. The idea was that it’d be all hypertexty and therefore better.

  • glad_cat@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Info is supposedly more modern, like a website. But it’s unusable and as annoying as emacs. Man is good enough.

  • iusearchbtw@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    man is standard Unix manual pages, while info is a documentation format introduced/popularised by GNU. info pages usually have a lot more information (sometimes including tutorials, guided examples, links to different pages and sections, etc (depending on the project maintainer obviously)) but man pages are the standard and basically everything has one. If you run info [program] for something without a dedicated info page, it will show the man page instead.

  • macallik@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    My impression
    tldr/cheat: Explains most popular arguments using as little words as possible
    man: Explains the entire command using a more technical tone
    info: Explains the entire command in slightly more informal tone. Can feel wordier as a result, but on the flipside it connects alternative/related commands in a logical way

    • folkrav@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I since switched to tldr (for the offline/caching functionality, I think?), but for the longest time I just used a wrapper function that did exactly this in my shell configuration. Something a bit like this:

      function cheatsh() { 
          curl cheat.sh/"\$1" 
      }