• lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I appreciate the leveled comment. It’s difficult to separate one’s more reactive side of anger with the reasonable side. There’s a reason the family of victims of crimes can’t be jurors. I, too, would not be able to hold it together if I was in the position of those impacted by this person. Still, like you said it’s vital we look at it from a position of a civilized society. The lens of Justice should not be focused on vengeance or punishment — both proven ineffective in terms of recidivism. Rather, the true pillars of justice involve: Separation from society, and rehabilitation (when possible). Arguably deterrence, but that is questionable.

    Someone like this should not just be sentenced to life imprisonment (as a precaution to civilized society), but also subject to scientific study from both life and after death in autopsy. Every. Single. Part of her makeup should be dissected from checking for tumors (Tower shooter), analyzing her brain chemistry, relentlessly studying her past and psychoanalyzing her.

    • ColorcodedResistor@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Absolutely studied down to the molecular level. She goes into college wanting to be a nurse and save babies. she comes out of college a murderer. what happened. what incident took place. did she just wake up one day and turn Joker? i want answers more than punishment. she deserves her judgement in full. why shouldn’t she be humanities guinea pig?