Wow, that is an EXTREMELY psychotic and paranoid delusional fantasy you’ve been cucked into believing. Not surprising since you do not have the capacity to differentiate between a serial killer and a drag queen, or the likelyhood of one being promoted instead of the other.
NOBODY HAS DEMANDED ACCESS TO CHILDREN. The only people who make that claim are pedophiles, so you’re going on the list like all the other pedophiles caught projecting nonstop.
READERS: NOTE THAT WE HAVE A POTENTIAL PEDOPHILE IN OUR MIDST, NAMED “PENIX”. Tracks, doesnt it?
Ah, ran out of arguments I see. The starting point is “let’s allow people to read to kids.” The next question is whether “people” here should include men In a dress. If you answer no, it’s on you to explain why it should not.
Its more fun to watch you run around in circles screaming at the screen. Also, you dont know what objective means, because serial killers are objectively not comparable to men in a costume.
Removed by mod
Wow, that is an EXTREMELY psychotic and paranoid delusional fantasy you’ve been cucked into believing. Not surprising since you do not have the capacity to differentiate between a serial killer and a drag queen, or the likelyhood of one being promoted instead of the other. NOBODY HAS DEMANDED ACCESS TO CHILDREN. The only people who make that claim are pedophiles, so you’re going on the list like all the other pedophiles caught projecting nonstop. READERS: NOTE THAT WE HAVE A POTENTIAL PEDOPHILE IN OUR MIDST, NAMED “PENIX”. Tracks, doesnt it?
Removed by mod
Ah, ran out of arguments I see. The starting point is “let’s allow people to read to kids.” The next question is whether “people” here should include men In a dress. If you answer no, it’s on you to explain why it should not.
Removed by mod
Its more fun to watch you run around in circles screaming at the screen. Also, you dont know what objective means, because serial killers are objectively not comparable to men in a costume.