• jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    “But we have a hundred years before the environment collapses!?”

    Theoretically yes, but there’s that sticky point of what happens to us when the environment is collapsing dying.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We also had decades to prevent climate change from happening and look how well we tackle it now.

      I’m confident we’ll have a plan to prevent that collapse that’s due within 100 years, but to keep it reasonable, its execution will be spread over 100 years, and we think about starting in 80 years providing everything goes well in the meantime.

      Chill, you can see it’s all taken care of!

      • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yup! I can just go about my life knowing that someone else will definitely take care of that pesky climate problem. No worries!

        *promptly forgets the world’s fucking dying and buys a latte

        • funktion@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s my plan. I didn’t ask to be born into this shit. The day the human race is wiped out is the day the Earth can finally start to heal, and maybe produce a species that will do better.

          • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            While I agree with the premise, I don’t agree with just giving up. I’ll be doing what I can to save what’s left until it’s gone and after that I’ll be trying to restore it until the oceans die and I suffocate, along with everyone else. Seeing how many other people are still driving cars and taking flights, I doubt my input will have any effect but that doesn’t matter.

            That one person that is still trying to fix this shit could be the difference between annihilation and salvation. Don’t give up.

            • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              I don’t think we’ll be around to see the oceans dry up. We probably will be around to see water wars, floods, and civilization collapsing. Look on the bright side, you’re probably more likely to die from cannibalism than lack of oxygen.

              • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                The oceans won’t dry up, the life in them (specifically phytoplankton) will die off when the water is too acidic and hot to support them. Phytoplankton produce the vast majority of the oxygen we breath and without them every oxygen breathing species on this planet will die, which obviously includes us. They are called a keystone species for a reason.

                • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  I misread your comment, sorry. Also, I didn’t know that, thanks for explaining. So shouldn’t the surplus of trees and plants due to high CO2 offset that a bit? Besides that, I think that society will collapse and the majority of the population will die off before we ever see that happen, but you are right, some of us might be around for that.

                  • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    IIRC terrestrial plants only create ~20% of the worlds oxygen, and this percentage is further reduced with areas being ‘developed’. Not to mention all the land that is used for forestry and agriculture. Plants are growing faster since they can create sugars at higher rates with all the CO2, but I highly doubt it’s enough balance out the potential loss of marine ecosystems. Losing those wouldn’t only affect oxygen levels, but it would also affect any and all animals that depend on those ecosystems as a food source. Thus, plants that rely on animals for pollination or spreading seeds will eventually die off too, leaving only plants that rely on wind even further reducing oxygen production.

    • fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      It reminds me about how people talk about not caring about how they treat their bodies because they’ll die early anyways, but they don’t realize that what it really affects is their quality of life as they get older