• Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I was trying to escape beer to save money, but at $2 a can non-alcoholic is even more expensive despite seemingly less taxes needing to be paid.

    • rbn@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Is non-alcoholic beer reallly more expensive than the regular? In Europe they’re on par in most places. In Northern Europe (Norway, Denmark) it’s even significantly cheaper due to taxes.

    • Otter@lemmy.caOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      My assumption was that it’s because it’s newer, so they need to make up that r&d cost. Once there is a lot more competition for it, the prices should come down.

      I’m just hoping for fewer drunk driving accidents and reduced health issues

      • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        R&D cost lol, there’s no such thing. That’s what companies want you to believe so they can upsell medicine and technology.

        This is just another market rife for capitalism to ensnare. Some guy crunched the numbers and found that x% don’t drink at events. So to recoup that lost revenue, they made this. The drinks, the ads, the news articles that cover it. All planted to drive up their bottom line.

        Because that’s how businesses work. They find an angle and swoop in and start setting up payment systems to see what people will begrudgingly pay for.