From what I can gather this conflict as been going on a long time and the Hamas group has existed for a while too. Why are all the news cycles suddenly focusing on this the past few weeks?

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Something like 10,000 civilians dead in the period of a month. Tends to draw the attention

    • fatbeer@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s that combined with the likelihood for this to turn into WWIII due to the complex web of nation alliances involved in this conflict.

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      OP has a point. There are other conflicts that have high body counts that don’t drive front page stories. Yemen. The stuff going on in Myanmar. Uyghurs. Even the migrant crisis in the Mediterranean.

      You’re right that this is a significant conflict, but our news industry doesn’t assign column inches to body count.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Not the volume of deaths, but the continuousness of deaths.

        Everyday another ~300 people die on average.

        Not to mention media availability, because it’s basically a prison having rockets thrown at it, media can get really good information. They’re not really in a war zone. It’s a one-sided killing field more or less. So great reporting conditions great visuals. Conflicts really concentrated. Just put the cameras right there. You’ll capture most of it.

        If it bleeds it leads.

  • lntl@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    because ridding Israel of “terrorists” is important to western agenda. it’s important lay people understand why all the “terrorists” had to be killed. even the juvenile ones

  • downpunxx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Gaza was given to Arabs for self rule and determination in 2005, all Jews left Gaza, even Jewish graveyards were dug up and moved, it was theirs to do with as they liked.

    They’ve spent the last 18 years making into a terrorist Disneyland with a dozen Islamofascist terrorist organizations with the stated goal of killing Jews and destroying the state of Israel, they’ve fired hundreds of thousands of missiles into Israel indiscriminately targeting civilians, and launched countless cross borders attacks against Jewish civilians, including one that caused the largest loss of Jewish life in any single day, anywhere, since the Holocaust on October 7th.

    They were given Gaza to live in freedom and self determination, they used it to kill Jews. They were warned. They chose to ignore the warnings.

    These acts of terrorism were perpetrated by the entire Gazan community, they voted for Hamas, and allowed Hamas to rule their government for the last 17 years, Hamas and all the other Islamic terrorists in Gaza are not outsiders, they were born in Gaza of Gazans, they were raised in Gaza, they were educated in Gaza, they married and had children of their own in Gaza, their Parents, teachers, mosques, hospitals, are all in Gaza, from which they use to hid and store weapons to attack Jews, Hamas, PIJ and all the other Islamic terrorist in Gaza ARE Gaza, there has been no uprising in Gaza, there have only been attacks on Israel. This is what Gazans have supported and sacrificed for in every way they possibly could.

    And now it’s here. I do hope they enjoy what they’ve worked generationaly to achieve.

    There will be no ceasefire this time.

    Am YIsrael Chai

  • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I posted this question too and got called a racist. I was just curious where all the Ukraine stuff went. Sounds like a planned distraction to me. And since Hamas announced it loves Russia…

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      News tends to be a zero sum game. There are a finite number of reporters that fit into a news budget, and they usually have a fixed number of stories they need to submit. News publications are usually measured in words or minutes, after which the publication stops for the current news cycle.

      So yeah, this topic will prevent coverage of other topics.

    • Corroded@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I feel like that’s a rather typical response when people question the attention level of current events. Things grab attention for a bit before something else comes along and takes a chunk of the spotlight.

      Every so often I still see the occasional sun bleached anti-China poster from a few years ago

    • donuts@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      There’s no doubt that Russia are backing Hamas and doing so mainly to divert resources and attention away from Ukraine.

      At the same time, the war in Ukraine is slowing down while the situation in Israel/Palestine has rapidly escalated.

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m going to go out on a limb here and suggest that the thousands of violent deaths may have something to do with it.

    • redballooon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Have you heard about Yemen recently?

      No? Then it must be quiet there. No deaths at all.

      • magnetosphere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        A cynical news producer would say “Yemen? Who cares? Muslims killing other Muslims is about as interesting as gang members killing other gang members. Give me Muslims and Jews killing each other, though, and we’re talking RATINGS, baby!”

  • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Israel’s genocidal revenge campaign is finally on full display with no legitimate distractions in the news cycle. Even in the US, despite the Israeli government’s efforts to influence ours, there’s public pushback that can’t be ignored.

    Also, if anything happening on the planet right now is going to ignite World War III, this is it.

    • AnarchoDakosaurus@toast.ooo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      For years many in Syria have said that WW3 has already begun and is being fought in the middle east. You could very well argue this is the opening stage of World War 3. We’re only one misclick, or one civilian airliner being shot down away from even greater catastrophe.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s an easy story, there are clear sides, and there are vocal demographics in the West that really care about it.

    So it drives clicks. Local Palestinian, Jewish, and related groups are saying stuff that makes for easy interviews. The “other side” is easy to find, so creating multi-source stories is a breeze. For journalists with tight daily deadlines, it’s a gift.

    Even better, politicians are courting those groups, so they’re saying stuff that, again, is easy to report on. And it’s local news!

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The right side, and the wrong side,. Plus you can interview people who argue about right versus wrong. It’s a lot of content that can be farmed

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            From a media perspective it doesn’t matter. Also there’s more than two sides.

            • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Which was the point I was getting to with the original commenter. But thanks for… ya know… jumping in.

              • otp@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                Having “clear sides” doesn’t mean there’s a clear “right side” and “wrong side”, imo.

                • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  The sides aren’t very clear when you start looking closer. And they’re both the wrong side of you think about it. The best side is the “wow that’s a shit show I’m glad I’m not involved with” side.

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        For every group saying “X is good/bad because Y” there’s another group willing to disagree for their own reasons.

        That provides journalists with an easy way to get balanced coverage and multiple sources on a story. Which their editors and peers expect.

  • SirToxicAvenger@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    the media requires people to pay attention to it or they cant sell ad placement. bad news sells better than good news does.

    the war in Ukraine is basically at a standstill, no one is going to watch it. media needs a new focus and Israel vs Iranian funded hamas terrorists is the next big thing. in a few months it’ll be something else - it’s just the focus of the “now”.