I love the way he immediately turned it around in the most fair reframing of her question imaginable, and she would not answer him. If anything, he was far too kind to her and granted far too many of her points.

Literally she could not say “yes” to “do you condemn Israel for killing innocents”. The easiest question in the world. But oh “it’s a pity he couldn’t keep his cool”.

If “Hamas” was using israelis as human shields, would Israel still kill thousands of israelis(, or westerners,) in order to kill some of them(, and create i.d.k. how many more in the meantime) ? She would be forced to answer no.

If Israel had been inhabited by jews for 1500 years, then arabs came and put them in what’s left of their territory, then attacked the arabs, would you condemn them ?
And if they were attacked viciously, creating so many civilians deaths, would you hesitate to condemn this genocide(, like in Yugoslavia or apparently millions of uyghurs as you forgot) ? We would support them militarily to prevent a genocide.

Yet she’s sincere, just doesn’t realize her double standards, Israel had no other choice, right.