That doesn’t answer my question at all, lol. That same thing happens in Capitalism, see: Batista’s Cuba, Pinochet’s Chile, Hitler’s Germany, etc.
Assuming democratic measures are in place, why is a class-based system like Capitalism less susceptible to issues stemming from greed than Socialism or Communism?
Authoritarian systems with lots of power in few hands are risky.
Can happen in capitalist systems aswell, but have there been any non authoritarian communist nations?
I agree, authoritarian systems with lots of power in few hands are indeed risky. Why is that necessary for Socialism or Communism, and why is it okay in Capitalism?
Depends. How do you define authoritarian? I’d argue all states are authoritarian, Capitalist or not, but get less so with development. Still, Capitalism remains a limiting factor, as it’s by structure authoritarian.
That doesn’t answer my question at all, lol. That same thing happens in Capitalism, see: Batista’s Cuba, Pinochet’s Chile, Hitler’s Germany, etc.
Assuming democratic measures are in place, why is a class-based system like Capitalism less susceptible to issues stemming from greed than Socialism or Communism?
Authoritarian systems with lots of power in few hands are risky. Can happen in capitalist systems aswell, but have there been any non authoritarian communist nations?
I agree, authoritarian systems with lots of power in few hands are indeed risky. Why is that necessary for Socialism or Communism, and why is it okay in Capitalism?
Havent pretty much all communist nations been very authoritarian? Not all capitalist nations are authoritarian
Depends. How do you define authoritarian? I’d argue all states are authoritarian, Capitalist or not, but get less so with development. Still, Capitalism remains a limiting factor, as it’s by structure authoritarian.